The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic Medical Terms Unknown To Brian Deer
 

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...he-big-lie-ii/

The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic MedicalTerms Unknown To Brian Deer
 

On 1/16/11 1:45 PM, john wrote:
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...he-big-lie-ii/

This is clearly a blog with an axe to grind.

Does the blog mention that the Deer Report was carefully reviewed and
all the records of the kids reviewed by the journal?

Jeff

The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic Medical Terms Unknown To Brian Deer
 

On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:45:38 -0000, "john" wrote:

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...he-big-lie-ii/

I notice it makes no attempt to explain Wakefield's business plan to
earn himself a few million dollars out of his enterprise? Why not?

They also seem to have omitted to explain that the "red book" is
filled in in part by the parents - who were involved in the
litigation Wakefield was being paid to help.

"No reasonable journal invites litigation. This suggests the BMJ is
“running scared”. "

Ah, right. Inviting someone to sue you if they think you have got it
wrong instead of wasting endless hours answering a stream of
increasingly inane questions from opponents with quasi religious
inability to see facts is "running scared"?