Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children’s English Skills: The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children.
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children’s English Skills
http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/tx/200706111.asp The Orelchikov family received an unannounced visit from child protective services recently due to an anonymous allegation that the family’s children were adopted and could only speak Russian. The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children. The Orelchikovs, being Home School Legal Defense Association members, phoned our hotline for help. HSLDA Attorney Chris Klicka called the social worker and explained that although Mr. Orelchikov was from Russia originally, he has been a U.S. citizen for seven years, and his children are Americans who speak English very well. He told the social worker that it was clear that the tipster was just being malicious because the allegations were completely bogus. After explaining the family’s innocence, Klicka also explained to the social worker the family’s Fourth Amendment rights and discussed with the social worker the Texas Code which requires “cause shown” in order to enter a family’s house and interview their children. He made it clear the Orelchikov family would not allow their children to be interviewed. Klicka directed the family in providing the social worker with 12 reference letters from individuals who know them well and could vouch for them being good parents. Furthermore, Klicka instructed the Orelchikovs to take their children to a doctor to prove that they are not being abused in any way. After sending the letters and medical records to the social worker, Klicka followed up with a letter of his own, reiterating the family’s innocence and the absurdity of the allegations. He also assured the social worker that the family was homeschooling pursuant to the law. Due to all the information sent to CPS proving the family’s innocence, the social worker had no reason to press any further for an investigation of the home or private interviews with the children. The social worker informed the family that she had closed the case. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... |
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children's English Skills: The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children.
On Jun 11, 3:23 pm, fx wrote:
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children's English Skills http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/tx/200706111.asp The Orelchikov family received an unannounced visit from child protective services recently due to an anonymous allegation that the family's children were adopted and could only speak Russian. The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children. The Orelchikovs, being Home School Legal Defense Association members, phoned our hotline for help. HSLDA Attorney Chris Klicka called the social worker and explained that although Mr. Orelchikov was from Russia originally, he has been a U.S. citizen for seven years, and his children are Americans who speak English very well. He told the social worker that it was clear that the tipster was just being malicious because the allegations were completely bogus. After explaining the family's innocence, Klicka also explained to the social worker the family's Fourth Amendment rights and discussed with the social worker the Texas Code which requires "cause shown" in order to enter a family's house and interview their children. He made it clear the Orelchikov family would not allow their children to be interviewed. Klicka directed the family in providing the social worker with 12 reference letters from individuals who know them well and could vouch for them being good parents. Furthermore, Klicka instructed the Orelchikovs to take their children to a doctor to prove that they are not being abused in any way. After sending the letters and medical records to the social worker, Klicka followed up with a letter of his own, reiterating the family's innocence and the absurdity of the allegations. He also assured the social worker that the family was homeschooling pursuant to the law. Due to all the information sent to CPS proving the family's innocence, the social worker had no reason to press any further for an investigation of the home or private interviews with the children. The social worker informed the family that she had closed the case. CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM.... CPS Does not protect children... It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. every parent should read this .pdf from connecticut dcf watch... http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US These numbers come from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN) Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS *Perpetrators of Maltreatment* Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59 Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13 Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241 Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12 Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5 Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers. BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION... That was a reasonable and responsible way to handle this case. I wonder what made anyone think that speaking only Russian was a crime, or what made hotline staff even let this through for investigation. It's absurd to think that it's some form of mistreatment, abuse, or neglect to raise a child speaking anything other than English. Thankfully the family had an attorney that they were able to confide in and get results from. |
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children's English Skills: The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children.
Agency hotline people don't know what to screen out?
Would a whore turn away money? Did they claim this one for Federal FUNDING purposes? How many case numbers did they assign for this investigation? The caseworker thought she had a legal obligation eh? Clearly she needs to get retrained about how to honor citizens Constitutional Rights at first contact. |
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children's English Skills: The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children.
On Jun 12, 2:28 am, Greegor wrote:
Agency hotline people don't know what to screen out? Would a whore turn away money? Don't know. Would you? Did they claim this one for Federal FUNDING purposes? How many case numbers did they assign for this investigation? The caseworker thought she had a legal obligation eh? Clearly she needs to get retrained about how to honor citizens Constitutional Rights at first contact. |
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children's English Skills: The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children.
On Jun 12, 1:55 pm, Dragon's Girl wrote:
On Jun 12, 2:28 am, Greegor wrote: Agency hotline people don't know what to screen out? Would a whore turn away money? Don't know. Would you? How would you explain the fact this was not screened out Betty? Do you think FUNDING has nothing to do with it? How do you explain that caseworker thinking she had an obligation to intrude? How could that be if they are TRAINED to know better? It's a FEDERAL requirement. How do you think this would have gone if this family hadn't had some vigorous legal representation? Did they claim this one for Federal FUNDING purposes? Can they, Kane? How many case numbers did they assign for this investigation? How much funding increase do they get for the case number they assigned to each person in the family? The caseworker thought she had a legal obligation eh? Clearly she needs to get retrained about how to honor citizens Constitutional Rights at first contact. |
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children's English Skills: The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children.
Hopefully they got enough funding to save some more little girls like
your girlfriends daughter, who were being subjected to the behavior YOU were demonstrating greg. I have often wondered if your hatred of CPS is your way of NOT dealing with your own behavior towards that little girl. And if your absurd advice to other parents struggling with these issues is merely "misery loves company" that makes sense, as well as you attacking any parent that had dealings with cps and came out of it with their children. Your sense of entittllement floors me. Your arrogance sickens me. Firemonkey On Jun 12, 12:57 pm, Greegor wrote: On Jun 12, 1:55 pm, Dragon's Girl wrote: On Jun 12, 2:28 am, Greegor wrote: Agency hotline people don't know what to screen out? Would a whore turn away money? Don't know. Would you? How would you explain the fact this was not screened out Betty? Do you think FUNDING has nothing to do with it? How do you explain that caseworker thinking she had an obligation to intrude? How could that be if they are TRAINED to know better? It's a FEDERAL requirement. How do you think this would have gone if this family hadn't had some vigorous legal representation? Did they claim this one for Federal FUNDING purposes? Can they, Kane? How many case numbers did they assign for this investigation? How much funding increase do they get for the case number they assigned to each person in the family? The caseworker thought she had a legal obligation eh? Clearly she needs to get retrained about how to honor citizens Constitutional Rights at first contact.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Social Worker Tries to Investigate Children's English Skills: The social worker insisted she had a legal obligation to enter the house and interview the children.
On Jun 12, 2:57 pm, Greegor wrote:
On Jun 12, 1:55 pm, Dragon's Girl wrote: On Jun 12, 2:28 am, Greegor wrote: Agency hotline people don't know what to screen out? Would a whore turn away money? Don't know. Would you? How would you explain the fact this was not screened out Betty? How would I explain it? I wouldn't know. There's no way in hell I'd defend it, or didn't you see my first post in this thread where I say it's absurd? Now you ask me to EXPLAIN IT? Get your head out your ass Greg. Do you think FUNDING has nothing to do with it? How do you explain that caseworker thinking she had an obligation to intrude? How could that be if they are TRAINED to know better? It's a FEDERAL requirement. How do you think this would have gone if this family hadn't had some vigorous legal representation? Did they claim this one for Federal FUNDING purposes? Can they, Kane? How many case numbers did they assign for this investigation? How much funding increase do they get for the case number they assigned to each person in the family? The caseworker thought she had a legal obligation eh? Clearly she needs to get retrained about how to honor citizens Constitutional Rights at first contact. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ParentingBanter.com