Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

"Greegor" wrote in message
oups.com...
Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Does it really matter gregg? We ran that pathetic dolt kenny out of here,
and the news group is the better for it. If he feels the need to sneak back
in under another name that's up to him, but at least he will know that we
exposed him for the fraud he is the first time and that we can do it again.

My guess, if I were forced to give one, is that they are a coalition of
individuals that have been subjected to kenny's inept posts before, and have
no wish to be forced to deal with him again.

Ron


On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and
basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and
basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane? He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

Doan

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane?

Foaming? That's your game, monkeyboy.

He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

R R R R R post the proof, dummy. It got tired of him dodging the study
by refusing to debate anything but the title of a REVIEW, and
conceded....rrrrr..just what I had said in the first place. That the
title was not consistent with the study OR even the article.

I'm still waiting for him to answer my challenge....what about the
study, Doan?

He ran.

I asked him to provide proof for his claim that there was scientific
evidence that children that are not spanked are at a higher risk of
developing "sociopathy."

HE RAN.

I later asked YOU to then defend his claim if you think he won. AND
DOAN........YOU RAN FASTER THAN HIM.

Doan

If anyone has missed what a liar, a proven liar you are, and have read
the exchange between you pet dog Ken, this would end any doubts of
theirs you ARE a liar.

0;]

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane?

Foaming? That's your game, monkeyboy.

Hihihi!

He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

R R R R R post the proof, dummy. It got tired of him dodging the study
by refusing to debate anything but the title of a REVIEW, and
conceded....rrrrr..just what I had said in the first place. That the
title was not consistent with the study OR even the article.

Hihihi! You CONCEDED! You LOST!

I'm still waiting for him to answer my challenge....what about the
study, Doan?

He ran.

Hihihi! You lost! End of story.

I asked him to provide proof for his claim that there was scientific
evidence that children that are not spanked are at a higher risk of
developing "sociopathy."

HE RAN.

I later asked YOU to then defend his claim if you think he won. AND
DOAN........YOU RAN FASTER THAN HIM.

Hihihi! He whipped your ass. You lost!


Doan

If anyone has missed what a liar, a proven liar you are, and have read
the exchange between you pet dog Ken, this would end any doubts of
theirs you ARE a liar.

Hihihi! You are a LOSER!

0;]

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:22:18 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane?

Foaming? That's your game, monkeyboy.

Hihihi!

He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

R R R R R post the proof, dummy. It got tired of him dodging the study
by refusing to debate anything but the title of a REVIEW, and
conceded....rrrrr..just what I had said in the first place. That the
title was not consistent with the study OR even the article.

Hihihi! You CONCEDED!

What did I "CONCEDED," Doan?

You LOST!

Show your proof. Don't leave out the link and the full quote,
monkeyboy.

I'm still waiting for him to answer my challenge....what about the
study, Doan?

He ran.

Hihihi! You lost! End of story.

Well it's the end of the story all right, as Ken ran, and so did YOU
when I asked YOU to defend HIS claim about non-spanked children,
coward.

I asked him to provide proof for his claim that there was scientific
evidence that children that are not spanked are at a higher risk of
developing "sociopathy."

HE RAN.

I later asked YOU to then defend his claim if you think he won. AND
DOAN........YOU RAN FASTER THAN HIM.

Hihihi! He whipped your ass. You lost!

You are lying again, little coward.


Doan

If anyone has missed what a liar, a proven liar you are, and have read
the exchange between you pet dog Ken, this would end any doubts of
theirs you ARE a liar.

Hihihi! You are a LOSER!

You are the loser because you are a coward.

Show what he won, Doan. Go ahead, provide something besides your usual
hysterical screeching and dancing monkeyboy act. R R R R R RRR

0;]

0;-]

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:22:18 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:56:11 -0800, Doan wrote:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:

On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?

Dennis Deakin?

Michael?

On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.



On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)

Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.

On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.

Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?

R R R RRR R R R RR R

He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.

Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane?

Foaming? That's your game, monkeyboy.

Hihihi!

He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!

R R R R R post the proof, dummy. It got tired of him dodging the study
by refusing to debate anything but the title of a REVIEW, and
conceded....rrrrr..just what I had said in the first place. That the
title was not consistent with the study OR even the article.

Hihihi! You CONCEDED!

What did I "CONCEDED," Doan?

The causal claim, STUPID!

You LOST!

Show your proof. Don't leave out the link and the full quote,
monkeyboy.

Hihihi! It's in the "archive", "never-spanked" Kane9!

I'm still waiting for him to answer my challenge....what about the
study, Doan?

He ran.

Hihihi! You lost! End of story.

Well it's the end of the story all right, as Ken ran, and so did YOU
when I asked YOU to defend HIS claim about non-spanked children,
coward.

Hihihi! LOSER!


I asked him to provide proof for his claim that there was scientific
evidence that children that are not spanked are at a higher risk of
developing "sociopathy."

HE RAN.

I later asked YOU to then defend his claim if you think he won. AND
DOAN........YOU RAN FASTER THAN HIM.

Hihihi! He whipped your ass. You lost!

You are lying again, little coward.

The proven LIAR is You. Hihihi!


Doan

If anyone has missed what a liar, a proven liar you are, and have read
the exchange between you pet dog Ken, this would end any doubts of
theirs you ARE a liar.

Hihihi! You are a LOSER!

You are the loser because you are a coward.

You are the coward that hide behind a nym!

Show what he won, Doan. Go ahead, provide something besides your usual
hysterical screeching and dancing monkeyboy act. R R R R R RRR

You CONCEDED! End of STORY, STUPID!

0;]

0;-]

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On Feb 20, 4:14 pm, Doan wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

....snip... responded to in another post...

You are the loser because you are a coward.

You are the coward that hide behind a nym!

What is your full name, 'Doan?'

Fern?

Observer?

And now many others?

R R R R R R R

You are still a coward, a liar, and a cheat, Doan.

Everyone can see it plainly and the ONLY support you get is from other
liars like yourself, Ken Pangborn, Greg Hansen and similar lowlifes.

You are a joke, Doan. Your family would puke if they could see what
you do here with your lies and dodges.

Tsk.

Ken Pangborn reneges on word
 

On Feb 21, 2:09 am, " KRP" wrote:
"0:-]" wrote in message

...

Well it's the end of the story all right, as Ken ran, and so did YOU
when I asked YOU to defend HIS claim about non-spanked children,
coward.

Man - you are a real badass behind people's backs aren't ya Kane?

"Behind people's backs?"

What a weird claim or accusation to make in a public forum, Kennyboy.

What precisely did I say or do "behind" your "back?""

You
were the one forced to concede,

Forced? R R RR R after a few months of insisting on arguing the title
of the article with you BY YOU, and refusing to move on, BY YOU, I
simply restated what I already had, that the title did NOT reflect the
article content, nor that of the study it was about. I "conceded" what
I had already agreed to, liar.

not just that the title was misleading

I had been saying that for some time before I "conceded."

but
that your "study" wasn't really a "study" as such.

Oh? I said that, did I? Where, exactly?

You are really incapable
of admitting you have been wrong.

About?

There's always a catch, isn't there?

In Kennyworld?

Always an out by which you can claim victory!

Well, it's hard to admit defeat when one has not been defeated, but
you go ahead and try to claim you won something, Kennyboy.

Just because I backed off

You ran from your own claims when I confronted you with them and asked
you to provide proof.

Usenet participation (largely with my psycho stalker and your HERO) doesn't
mean I surrendered to a buffoon blow hard like you. Get over yourself and
your megalomania.

Projection, Kennyboy.

You are blowing hard NOW, instead of answering the challenges YOU
created with your buffoon claims about the internation STUDY, which is
exactly what it was, and your bull**** claim that you knew of
evidence, scientific evidence, that children that are not spanked are
at risk of developmental "sociopathy."

And you are still blowing hard, stupid.

I note the first thing you did was remove ALL relevant addressed,
Kennyboy.

Why is that I wonder?

You stripped the spanking, foster parent, and dad's rights....tsk.

Why am I not surprized.

R R R R R R

You have no honor. No ethics. Nothing but bull****. And everyone can
see it.

So then. You were going to show us how and what I conceded, Kenny?

And that there still is evidence of this sociopathy in unspanked
children?

We are waiting.

Kane