ParentingBanter.com

ParentingBanter.com (http://www.parentingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Kids Health (http://www.parentingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Eulogy for Dr Hulda Clark (http://www.parentingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=66375)

Bob Officer October 13th 09 05:04 PM

Eulogy for Dr Hulda Clark
 
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:59:25 -0400, in misc.health.alternative,
dr_jeff wrote:

t wrote:

"dr_jeff" wrote in message
...
t wrote:

"dr_jeff" wrote in message
...
t wrote:


Bwahahaha!!!! quackwatch????? You post quackwatch as proof? What ARE
vthey putting in your food? Hehehehehe!!! quackwatch, Bwahahahaha!!!
Funny, you posted a funny! And you have a degree? Bwahahaha!!!

You subscribe to the lie that Clark caused harm to people? Post
proof .

http://www.quackwatch.com/01Quackery...cer/clark.html

Why don't go ahead and explain why the claims in the Quackwatch site
are incorrect instead of just dismissing them?

Yes if she left Indiana because of persicution from people like you


What "persicution?" People like me? You mean people who saw through her
false claims?


Rather than stay and allowing the state to prove her guilt, She fled
across state lines to avoid prosecution, itself a crime.

Do you think it's ok that she had to flee Indiana?


No, she didn't have to flee. If what she were doing were ok, she should
have had no problem proving that in court.


But the courts would demand evidence. They had statements and
evidence enough to show a crime had been committed.

Please provide real
proof that her "zapper" did nothing.


Come on. It did enrich her bank account. However, it didn't help anyone.
If you think otherwise, you need to prove it.

http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/02230...mp0223051.shtm


Oh, that evidence shows it did do something, but nothing that she
claimed.

Do you think it is ok
that she made a zapper that didn't do anything and charged people for
it? History is full of laws and drugs that were wrong. Many times they
are there only to protect vested interests, like yours.


Really? I have vested interests? What ones?


Claims of interests without supporting evidence. Sounds like dogma of
a religious nature.

Is it ok if
she had a clinic in Mexico because consumer protection laws wouldn't
allow her to have one in the US?


I guess *you* think it is. I don't.


Mexico needs to clean up its act. But then there really is much
government power outside the military.


--
Bob Officer
Posting the truth
http://www.skeptics.com.au


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ParentingBanter.com