Joe the Plumber was a hoax
 

Notice that DB never denied fathering his kids.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:16:49 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... calling DB stupid, apparently due to the government's
actions of adding false arrearages.

Are you claiming that DB didn't father the children?

He had already admitted otherwise.

Can't you read?

Your 'example' was not one of actual paternity.

Are you still totally confused about that?

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:25:58 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... I am claiming that the
government's demand that he supply the mother of his children with money
is not supporting children.

He shouldn't have had kids if he wasn't prepared to
support them, economically and in other ways.

Do you think that by paying mothers, fathers are fulfilling their role
as parents?

Do you imagine anyone had claimed that'd be the sole
responsibility involved in paternity?

Someone as stupid as you are certainly shouldn't reproduce.

On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:27 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

He didn't "have" the kids ...

Paternity is, in fact, parenthood.

You merely failed to learn basic biology.

...the sick
folks ...

Don't procreate if you're not sufficiently
healthy to understand what's involved.

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:20:58 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

... on narcotics ...

Well, something has prevented you
from reading for comprehension.

Joe the Plumber was a hoax
 

"* US *" wrote in message ...
Notice that DB never denied fathering his kids.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:16:49 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... calling DB stupid, apparently due to the government's
actions of adding false arrearages.

Are you claiming that DB didn't father the children?

He had already admitted otherwise.

Can't you read?

Your 'example' was not one of actual paternity.

Are you still totally confused about that?

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:25:58 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... I am claiming that the
government's demand that he supply the mother of his children with money
is not supporting children.

He shouldn't have had kids if he wasn't prepared to
support them, economically and in other ways.

Do you think that by paying mothers, fathers are fulfilling their role
as parents?

Do you imagine anyone had claimed that'd be the sole
responsibility involved in paternity?

Someone as stupid as you are certainly shouldn't reproduce.

On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:27 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

He didn't "have" the kids ...

Paternity is, in fact, parenthood.

You merely failed to learn basic biology.

...the sick
folks ...

Don't procreate if you're not sufficiently
healthy to understand what's involved.

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:20:58 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

... on narcotics ...

Well, something has prevented you
from reading for comprehension.

LOVE your copy/paste reply.

Joe the Plumber was a hoax
 

"* US *" wrote in message ...
Notice that DB never denied fathering his kids.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:16:49 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... calling DB stupid, apparently due to the government's
actions of adding false arrearages.

Are you claiming that DB didn't father the children?

He had already admitted otherwise.

Can't you read?

Your 'example' was not one of actual paternity.

Are you still totally confused about that?

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:25:58 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... I am claiming that the
government's demand that he supply the mother of his children with money
is not supporting children.

He shouldn't have had kids if he wasn't prepared to
support them, economically and in other ways.

Do you think that by paying mothers, fathers are fulfilling their role
as parents?

Do you imagine anyone had claimed that'd be the sole
responsibility involved in paternity?

Someone as stupid as you are certainly shouldn't reproduce.

On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:27 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

He didn't "have" the kids ...

Paternity is, in fact, parenthood.

You merely failed to learn basic biology.

...the sick
folks ...

Don't procreate if you're not sufficiently
healthy to understand what's involved.

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:20:58 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

... on narcotics ...

Well, something has prevented you
from reading for comprehension.

LOVE your copy/paste reply.

Idiot "Chris" [email protected] keeps bleating, was Joe the Plumber was a hoax
 

"* US *" wrote in message ...
Notice that DB never denied fathering his kids.

Poor Chris is too stupid to notice such facts.

He seems unable to read for comprehension.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:16:49 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... calling DB stupid, apparently due to the government's
actions of adding false arrearages.

Are you claiming that DB didn't father the children?

He had already admitted otherwise.

Can't you read?

Your 'example' was not one of actual paternity.

Are you still totally confused about that?

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:25:58 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... I am claiming that the
government's demand that he supply the mother of his children with money
is not supporting children.

He shouldn't have had kids if he wasn't prepared to
support them, economically and in other ways.

Do you think that by paying mothers, fathers are fulfilling their role
as parents?

Do you imagine anyone had claimed that'd be the sole
responsibility involved in paternity?

Someone as stupid as you are certainly shouldn't reproduce.

On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:27 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

He didn't "have" the kids ...

Paternity is, in fact, parenthood.

You merely failed to learn basic biology.

...the sick
folks ...

Don't procreate if you're not sufficiently
healthy to understand what's involved.

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:20:58 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

... on narcotics ...

Well, something has prevented you
from reading for comprehension.

Hey look everybody, I have my very own personal groupie/troll!

Idiot "Chris" [email protected] keeps bleating, was Joe the Plumber was a hoax
 

"* US *" wrote in message ...
Notice that DB never denied fathering his kids.

Poor Chris is too stupid to notice such facts.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:16:49 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... calling DB stupid, apparently due to the government's
actions of adding false arrearages.

Are you claiming that DB didn't father the children?

He had already admitted otherwise.

Can't you read?

Your 'example' was not one of actual paternity.

Are you still totally confused about that?

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:25:58 -0600, "Phil" wrote:

... I am claiming that the
government's demand that he supply the mother of his children with money
is not supporting children.

He shouldn't have had kids if he wasn't prepared to
support them, economically and in other ways.

Do you think that by paying mothers, fathers are fulfilling their role
as parents?

Do you imagine anyone had claimed that'd be the sole
responsibility involved in paternity?

Someone as stupid as you are certainly shouldn't reproduce.

On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:27 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

He didn't "have" the kids ...

Paternity is, in fact, parenthood.

You merely failed to learn basic biology.

...the sick
folks ...

Don't procreate if you're not sufficiently
healthy to understand what's involved.

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:20:58 -0800, "Chris" wrote:

... on narcotics ...

Well, something has prevented you
from reading for comprehension.

Hey look everybody, I have my very own personal groupie/troll!