The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR

NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Doan

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:

The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR

NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Doan

Is this another "mistake", Kane? ;-)

Doan

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

Doan wrote:
The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

Ever think there might be commentary from other sources on the study.
Authoritative commentary. By people that know the study in more depth
than was printed in the report?

I have no obligation to, and in fact a promise not to, respond on Embry
when the questions come from you. You lost the right to have me reply.

I'm not going to tell you were I got that information.

Dumb little ****head. R R R R R R

Doan

Tell us again that you believe that "parents should make up their own
minds." Go ahead. I have some postings I'd like to make in relation to
that.

0:-


--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doan wrote:


The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR

NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Doan


Is this another "mistake", Kane? ;-)

No, does this indicate how stupid you really are?

Doan

why would I be restricted to the Embry study for comment on the Embry
study?

I told you, I'm not debating you on the Embry study. You refused to
debate me when you had the chance. I even offered, if you'd tell the
truth, to send you a copy.

You lied, or you withheld proof you had it. The deadline passed.

I'd be less than honorable to go back on my promise to you.

Keep ON A'smilin' R R R R R


0:-

--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Doan

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

Doan wrote:

...nothing of consequence....

The "indignant fraud" charge doesn't get by me either silly boy.




--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Hypocrit!


Doan


0:-





--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

LOL! "never-spanked" boy!

Doan

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:

..nothing of consequence....

The "indignant fraud" charge doesn't get by me either silly boy.




--
Isn't it interesting that the more honest an author appears to be,
the more like ourselves we think him. And the less so, how very
alien he doth appear? Kane 2006

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:


Doan wrote:

The Lie:

"Pretty remarkable when one considers that parents who spanked before
had children that attemped entries at the highest rate of all per
hour."

Still don't know where I got that, eh? R R R R RR


NOT FROM THE EMBRY STUDY!

Didn't say I did. 0:-

I thought so! ;-)

Hypocrit!

So now that we have determined that it is not from the study, the above
quotes are nothing more than hearsay, at best, and at worst, OUTRIGHT
FABRICATION!

Doan

The Embry study: What it actually said.
 

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:

..nothing of consequence....

The "indignant fraud" charge doesn't get by me either silly boy.

And your LIES don't get by me neither, "never-spanked" boy! ;-)

Doan