covering up the deaths and injuries from Avandia.
 

Here is the senate record of the corruption instigated by Glaxo with regard
to covering up the deaths and injuries from Avandia.
http://www.yousendit.com/download/Rm...YWJwcFZFQlE9PQ

covering up the deaths and injuries from Avandia.
 

"john" wrote in message
...

Here is the senate record of the corruption instigated by Glaxo with
regard to covering up the deaths and injuries from Avandia.
http://www.yousendit.

Unless you had verifiable proof that deaths were caused by Glaxo you
just put yourself into a precarious position by slamming the product
with that conclusive statement of yours.

Do we get to see you go bye bye now? 5-10?

Santa Clara County sues Glaxo over diabetes drug
 

Santa Clara County sues Glaxo over diabetes drug

March 01, 2010 3:12 PM

SAN JOSE (AP) — A Northern California county has filed suit against
GlaxoSmithKline accusing the pharmaceutical company of suppressing evidence
that its diabetes drug Avandia causes increased risk of heart attacks.

The lawsuit filed by Santa Clara County seeks restitution for all Avandia
purchasers in California claiming the company violated state
false-advertising statutes.

"GSK's unlawful conduct has cost patients, their insurers, and government
payors millions of dollars, and it has caused needless suffering to
thousands of Californians," said Santa Clara County's acting county counsel
Miguel Marquez. "This is precisely the sort of corporate malfeasance that
California law prohibits."

County officials say their lawsuit is the first by a government entity
against the company over Avandia. It was filed in U.S. District Court,
Northern California District, on Friday.

The company, which is based in London, says the lawsuit has no merit and
that scientific evidence shows the FDA-approved drug doesn't increase heart
attack risk.

The lawsuit follows the release of a U.S. Senate report last month charging
that Glaxo minimized Avandia's safety risks and withheld data from the Food
and Drug Administration.

Senators said the Senate Finance Committee's report was based on
researchers' studies of Avandia, internal GlaxoSmithKline documents and FDA
documents.

Vioxx
 

Vioxx killed up to 140,000 people after being ‘proved safe’ in animals,
including monkeys. http://whale.to/a/vioxx_h.html

Glaxo Knew Avandia Caused Heart Risk, Report Says
 

Glaxo Knew Avandia Caused Heart Risk, Report Says (Update1)

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aZsrUQ9LOMwI


By Rob Waters

Feb. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Safety reviewers at the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration urged the agency to take GlaxoSmithKline Plc’s diabetes drug
Avandia off the market in 2008 because they said it was causing 500
additional heart attacks per month. Two U.S. senators say they want to know
why the medicine remains on pharmacy shelves.

A report released today by Senators Max Baucus and Charles Grassley said
Glaxo knew Avandia may cause heart damage several years before a study
documented the risk and the company pressed doctors to retract warnings
about side effects. Baucus, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, and
Grassley, the committee’s ranking Republican, are pressing the FDA for
answers.

Avandia came on the market in 1999 and achieved annual revenue of $3 billion
by 2006, including sales of a combination drug that includes Avandia. Sales
plummeted to $1.2 billion in 2009, two years after a study was published in
the New England Journal of Medicine that linked Avandia to a 43 percent
increased risk of heart attack. Two FDA officials also reviewed the drug’s
safety and concluded in their 2008 report that Avandia was exposing users to
higher risks for heart attacks, or myocardial infarctions, without being any
more effective than a rival drug, Tokyo-based Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.’s
Actos.

Heart Failure

“These increased risks have caused a substantial excess of acute myocardial
infarctions and heart failure that would not have occurred” had Actos been
used instead, wrote David Graham and Kate Gelperin, the two FDA officials,
in the report. Avandia “should be removed from the market.”

Glaxo, in a statement e-mailed today by Mary Anne Rhyne, a company
spokeswoman, said it rejects conclusions that Avandia is risky for patients.

“The scientific evidence simply does not establish that Avandia increases
ischemic cardiovascular risk or causes myocardial ischemic events,” she
said.

“The FDA considered all the available scientific evidence on Avandia,
including Dr. Graham’s assertions of elevated heart attack risk and demands
that the product be withdrawn,” the statement said. “Based on the scientific
evidence and a recommendation by an independent advisory committee of
experts convened by the FDA, the agency has ruled that Avandia remain
available to patients for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.”

FDA Reviewing

Karen Riley, an FDA spokeswoman, said in an e-mail that the agency is
“reviewing the report from the senators, we take it very seriously and we
will reply quickly.”

In the 2008 report, the FDA safety officers also said that a medical trial
comparing Avandia with Actos that was being planned would be “unethical and
exploitive” because it would expose patients to unwarranted risks. That
trial, called TIDE, which was planned to involve 16,000 patients, is now
under way.

Baucus, a Montana Democrat, and Grassley, an Iowa Republican, sent a letter
Feb. 18 to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg asking what steps the agency
was taking to protect patients in the TIDE trial and demanded a response to
their concerns by March 4.

Today’s Senate committee report said executives of London- based Glaxo
obtained a copy of the 2007 New England Journal study in advance of its
publication from a company consultant who also worked as a reviewer for the
journal. Although company scientists internally recognized the study’s
validity and acknowledged Avandia’s heart risks, Glaxo prepared a public
relations effort to refute suggestions that the drug triggered heart
attacks, according to internal e-mails reviewed by Senate researchers cited
in the report.

Downplay Findings

“It can be argued that GSK had a duty to warn patients and the FDA of the
Company’s concerns,” wrote Baucus and Grassley in the Senate committee
report. “Instead, GlaxoSmithKline executives attempted to intimidate
independent physicians, focused on strategies to minimize or misrepresent
findings that Avandia may increase cardiovascular risk, and sought ways to
downplay findings that a competing drug might reduce cardiovascular risk.”

The risks were described in today’s New York Times in a story based on the
Senate report and other documents.

Glaxo pressed medical researchers who observed the emergence of heart and
liver problems in patients taking Avandia to stop disseminating their
findings, contacting the doctors’ superiors in several cases, according to
the report.

Glaxo fell 58 cents, or 1.5 percent, to $38.26 in New York Stock Exchange
composite trading yesterday. The stock is up 18 percent in the past 12
months.

Sales of Actos, Takeda’s competing drug, were $4.4 billion for the year
ended March 2009.

To contact the reporter on this story: Rob Waters in San Francisco at
.
Last Updated: February 20, 2010 16:36 EST