ParentingBanter.com

ParentingBanter.com (http://www.parentingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Kids Health (http://www.parentingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck's Gardasil Partner By Mark Blaxill (http://www.parentingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=66828)

john[_5_] May 12th 10 07:31 PM

A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck's Gardasil Partner By Mark Blaxill
 
http://whale.to/vaccine/a_license_to_kill.html



Peter B.[_2_] May 13th 10 02:54 AM

A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck's Gardasil Partner By Mark Blaxill
 

"john" wrote in message
...
http://a_license_to_kill.html


No need for part two, your stupidity already shows through.



john[_5_] May 13th 10 06:12 AM

A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck's Gardasil Partner By Mark Blaxill
 
Out of 11,778 Gardasil recipients, over 90% of them young women between the
ages of 9 and 23, one would expect an annual death rate to be a mix of the
rates for the two reference groups, or less than 4 per 10,000 in an entire
year. But in the trials, there were three “sudden deaths”, i.e. deaths that
occurred within just the two weeks of the Gardasil injections, in a review
period of less than forty-five days. That’s a death rate close to ten times
higher than would be expected such a short period. And the overall Gardasil
death rate of 8.5 per 10,000 (10 deaths out of 11,778) for the 12 month
period of the trial is more than twice what one would expect.



Happy Oyster May 13th 10 06:14 AM

A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck's Gardasil Partner By Mark Blaxill
 
On Thu, 13 May 2010 06:12:55 +0100, "john" wrote:

Out of 11,778 Gardasil recipients, over 90% of them young women between the
ages of 9 and 23, one would expect an annual death rate to be a mix of the
rates for the two reference groups, or less than 4 per 10,000 in an entire
year. But in the trials, there were three “sudden deaths”, i.e. deaths that
occurred within just the two weeks of the Gardasil injections, in a review
period of less than forty-five days. That’s a death rate close to ten times
higher than would be expected such a short period. And the overall Gardasil
death rate of 8.5 per 10,000 (10 deaths out of 11,778) for the 12 month
period of the trial is more than twice what one would expect.


That is bull****.

--
.................................................. ..................
http://twitter.com/aribertdeckers http://twitter.com/kidmed_de
http://twitter.com/kidmed_de http://twitter.com/aribertdeckers
.................................................. ..................

Peter B.[_2_] May 13th 10 08:39 AM

A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck's Gardasil Partner By Mark Blaxill
 
"john" wrote in message
...
Out of 11,778 Gardasil recipients, over 90% of them young women between
the ages of 9 and 23, one would expect an annual death rate to be a mix of
the rates for the two reference groups, or less than 4 per 10,000 in an
entire year. But in the trials, there were three "sudden deaths", i.e.
deaths that occurred within just the two weeks of the Gardasil injections,
in a review period of less than forty-five days. That's a death rate close
to ten times higher than would be expected such a short period. And the
overall Gardasil death rate of 8.5 per 10,000 (10 deaths out of 11,778)
for the 12 month period of the trial is more than twice what one would
expect.


Idiot, there were more deaths for corn on the cob eaters.20 deaths out of
11,000 for a 12 month trial period and more sudden deaths within one week of
eating Corn.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ParentingBanter.com