Greegor wrote:
I have mixed feelings about this one.
Greg, don't you get it yet? You two are a village idiot act. No one
gives a flying puck what your "feelings about" anything are. Because you
are Most Often Wrong Hanson, the idiot poster to Usenet.
I think the obsessive reporter is an ass, but
maybe the person is ticked off because Britney
isn't under intense CPS supervision already.
Gee, you think this is important do you? And lends some support to
Michael's lying bull**** signoff on his posts?
Get a life, both of you.
If a normal person drove with a kid on their lap,
CPS would have done a child removal.
Provide at least ONE citation of such an incident, dimbulb.
The "normal person" would have gotten an LE cite, and nothing more.
Now by the third incident or so (I believe there was a case in TX where
the got ****ed and deliberately did it again to provoke the cop...who
she knew) THEN CPS might get called.
So, babbler, show us a citation for a single stop incident where the cop
took the child and delivered it to CPS...go for it stupid.
If a normal person has a drug habit, bounces in
and out of rehab, shaved their head etc.
CPS would have done a child removal,
insisted on drug treatment and used the
child to extort a service plan psych eval done
by a psychologist beholden to them for income.
Now you have one that might fly. But please explain how the behavior you
just described would indicate a person is 'normal.'
And why someone doing those things with a baby in tow they are
responsible for would be being 'extort'[ed] to the services you mention?
Are YOU, trying to PRETEND to tell US, Greg, that YOU haven't said
yourself you have NO USE for druggies and the child SHOULD be removed?
Wanna see your posts?
Now, because you want to make a case...a non-existent one...against CPS,
you suddenly have a change of heart?
You think a person has a drug habit, bounces in
and out of rehab, shaved their head etc.
CPS should NOT do a removal?
WHY should Britney get special treatment?
Well, could be that she meets the criteria for having respite for her
child and uses it.
It's the money, kiddo. You know, like you want so badly from the Iowa
taxpayers for an alleged offense against you by CPS.
....
CPS would have done a child removal,
insisted on drug treatment and used the
child to extort a service plan psych eval done
by a psychologist beholden to them for income.
....
That's so cute I just had to copy and paste so we could read your
babbling diatribe again. It's enough to replace my morning coffee for a
pickmeup, Greg. Thanks.
Michael is, as he always did, making a fool of himself with these
pointless postings over his dishonest sig line.
But you love it. Wallow in it, like a pig in ****. Happy grin on your
face too.
You and your cronies claim WE drove people away from this
newsgroup...when the fact is ALL THE PEOPLE YOU ATTACK HERE ARE parents
that prevailed against CPS and helped each other do so.
You've been at this for years. Your persistence here strongly suggest
YOU either are nutso, or you are a government agent yourself sent to
disrupt family advocates that WIN in CPS cases.
Can you explain your attacks?
You just went after another one. Didn't you? Bringing up her posting to
another news group as a way try and embarrass her.
She did not do a damn thing to you, Greg, except post civilly to others
here that you have targeted.
Can you explain yourself?
Or are you an agent?
On Jul 17, 1:25 am, fx wrote:
Britney Spears "Stalker" Calls Child Protective Services on Mom?
By Angela Carson
Jul 13, 2007
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...72614716.shtml
Should the state of California be checking out the welfare of the
children of Britney Spears? The former pop princess is often slammed
for her poor habits as a mother and she has still yet to live down that
whole incident where she was spotted driving with Sean Preston last year
on her lap down the Pacific Coast Highway.
She was even criticized earlier when she had her kids out skinny dipping
because they looked a bit red. And a report claims that child
protective services are getting calls about young momma Britney and the
way she treats her kids. Lots of calls.
***
But according to the news room at AOL's celebrity website TMZ.Com a
whole bunch of the "concerned" calls are coming from one person. The
website reports that it has learned that Children's Services was phoned
on Britney Spears multiple times last week -- but it turns out the
person that was calling is a nut.
Sources cited in the item posted online say Britney has a "stalker" who
has become irritated with her. The man began calling the L.A. County
Department of Child and Family Services and lodging "bizarre" complaints
against Spears.
***
Someone from the Department made contact with one of Britney's reps, the
report claims, but it became obvious during the call that the complaints
were bogus -- and the matter was dropped.
CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....
CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.
every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...
http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf
http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com
Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS
*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*
Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5
Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.
BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...