DCF's notorious failures are outpacing even the big increases in its appropriations because family disintegration itself is outpacing those appropriations.
Kane wrote
Did you vet this with your other socks and Greg before you posted an
opinion with this in it, right at the close of the comments?
"Meanwhile, what calls itself the Family Institute of Connecticut,
whose name presumes concern with the real problem, instead spends most
of its time railing against homosexuals -- the one group completely
innocent of the whole mess."
What part of this was the main point, and what points take a back
seat?
Which points are you obsessed with Kane?
In other words you are posting, for you claim in your sig below, the
support of a known "homosexual foster or adoptive parent" supporter.
What part of his ""sig"" are you referring to Kane?
|