The simple facts are this.. MA is one of the most extreme pro-radfem
states, er, Commonwealth's, in the country. They flat out cannot stand
single fathers, married fathers nor even non-married fathers. If it's a
father of any kind, cept for the cathloc kind that loves to play with alter
boys.. then they go by the watch-words of: "Distrust and Vilify".

MA "family courts will so rarely allow a downward modification that people
never know when they happen. And often the amount involved is such a
pitance that it doesn't bear mentioning in the media (or anywhere else for
that matter).

The part where the reporter from the globe claims that even married and
non-married parents are subject to the law is a friggin' joke. When was the
last time anyone ever heard of a married parent being dragged into court to
explain why they haven't spent 3/4 of their pay on little Johny of Susie??
When?? What millenium was it in??

Yupper, leave it to MA to "help" NCP's.. right into the slammer.