"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"elizabeth" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Apr 8, 7:21 pm, "Gini" wrote:
"elizabeth" wrote
.................
Letting your child live in poverty means you are the sort of
heartless
asshole who should be castrated, because we don't need
more irresponsible assholes breeding children that the rest of
society
must support.

==
Indeed. Sterilize all welfare women of childbearing age.

As long as you sterilize all the men impregnating them, fine.
And since vasectomies are a couple of orders of magnitude CHEAPER than
tubals, and since vasectomies are at least an order of magnitude MORE
EFFECTIVE THAN TUBALS, it's far more cost effective to snip the men,
especially when you factor in the cost of medical complications of
tubals . . . tubals do kill women, but no man has ever died from a
vasectomy.

Oh for goodness sake, grow up!! If a woman is banging out a ******* a
year,
by a different man each time, she should have her plumbing removed so she
can't bring any more children into the world that she has no intention of
ever supporting.

If a man is reepopulating a small city with his bedroom antice, he should
be
similarly rendered sterile.

Everyone needs to take responsibility for their own sexual behavior. And
setting up a system where woman bears child, and dad pays for 18-22 years
is
NOT effective. 50/50 joint custody with both parents being required to
work
to support the child their 50% of the time would be far more realistic.

Not to mention FAIR to everyone involved! Something the "family court" will
have NOTHING to do with. Could you imagine the public outcry if they enacted
such a principle? They say "replace fathers for children with free money to
mothers". I say, "replace free money to mothers with fathers for children"!