View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 26th 10, 04:16 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids,misc.kids.health,sci.med
Mike[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Immunization Graphs:

Steven Bornfeld wrote:
john wrote:
http://genesgreenbook.com/resources/...phs-RO2009.pdf


Figures one (1) through eleven (11) graphically illustrate that in
North America, Europe, and the South Pacific , major declines in
life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either
without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific
diseases as listed. This provides irrefutable evidence that vaccines
are not necessary for the effective elimination of a wide range of
infectious diseases
Figures eleven (12) through twenty-four (24) graphically
illustrate that immunization is not by any means a proven and
foolproof measure for protection from various infectious disease
conditions. It is often inconsequential epidemiologically, and in some
cases it is shown to actually worsen health-care outcomes.



http://jdc325.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/measles/


So?

The point was that measles incidence and mortality sharply decreased
well before the vaccinations. It stands.

Some numbers: 863 deaths in the USA in the 1958-1967 - that is, 10 years
before the vaccinations.
In 1968-1977 - 292 deaths
In 1979-1988 - 140
In 1989-1998 - 10

So far, so good. But it 1933, there were 44 deaths in the FIRST 10 WEEKS
in New York City ALONE.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...747256,00.html

There are also graphs at http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/
and
http://1phil4everyill.wordpress.com/...cure-or-cause/

We can see for example that measles mortality in the USA in 1933 was
about 80 cases per 1 million population - that is, about 10,000 cases.
Per year, not per 10 years.

That translates to 92% reduction in 35 years from 1933 to 1968,
without vaccinations.

Now vax flacks want us to believe that 66% or 87% decrease of deaths
in 10 years are solely the result of vaccinations.
Sorry, it does not fly. Part of it - yes, but all of it - no.