Doan wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Kane wrote:


Doan lies. His goal is disruption not debate. Except for his not
leaving, he is a Usenet Troll focused on one ng.

Spanking is the subject of this ng.

Any parenting method that does not include CP IS about CP by it's
replacement.

And the Embry study is about a parenting method to teach children to
play in areas safely away from street traffic.

It does not include spanking, hence it is about alternatives to spanking.


Don't you just love this logic? ;-) Using this logic, since this study
doesn't include feeding your children, hence it is about alternatives to
feeding your children!

LOGIC AND THE ANTI-SPANKING ZEALOTS... ARE THEY MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE? ;-)

Yoo hooooo....yoo hoo, droan't, the name of this newsgroup is NOT
"alt.parenting.feeding-your-children"

And we have never argued here about alternatives to feeding.

Tell us again about "logic."

For those of you unfamiliar with debate, and logical fallacy, that one
doan't tried is called a "Red Herring." It doesn't really have a thing
to do with the issues under consideration. Spanking and alternatives to
spanking.

Doan

Sorry, doan't, you are shown to be a disruptive little brat again.

That's all right pat pat pat on the head but you are obviously not
going to get over it. It's called a disability. Tsk.

(Stick around and watch the response folks.)




--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin