View Single Post
  #10  
Old May 30th 09, 06:27 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,misc.kids,talk.politics.medicine,misc.headlines
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,321
Default Ordering Daniel Hauser to have chemo

Happy Oyster wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 16:29:07 GMT, Jeff wrote:

Happy Oyster wrote:


...

Yet no one is trying kill or harm the boy.


Not gving the boy he right treatment is letting him die, and EXACTLY THAT is
what the parents are doing.


No it isn't. The parents came to the conclusion that the boy needs
chemotherapy, apparently on their own. So they are giving him the needed
treatments. I am not sure they would have been doing so without court
supervision.

Even so, they had no wish to hurt the boy. They were mistaken in their
understanding of chemotherapy and the boy's illness. There is a big
difference between trying to kill a kid and having innocent actions that
lead to a kid's death.