Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote
If you read the GAO report closely, and understand the English language
and the rules of syntax you know that stating there was "not a
consensus" means there were two opposing findings. One against, and
Greg, that means there has to have been research that found FOR the
cycle of abuse.

Of Course! Did you believe big tobacco research?

The were PROVEN to have fudged and lied.

Now show us from the researchers cited in the report, exactly who lied
and fudged their research.

You have, for as long back as your posting history is available, always
failed to accept the burden of proof, Greg.

Look at it like this, if you are willing to do a bit of honest
introspection: If you won't give proofs, but simply make wild claims, as
you just did above, could it be that you are wrong?

I mean when you do it year after year after year, obviously something is
wrong with your thinking, boy.

0:-



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)