Tenn. Parents Sue School Over Cameras
"Poop Dogg" wrote:
Some woman was even arrested recently after a Wal-Mart employee saw
a picture of a 2yo child sitting naked in a kiddy pool.
Many arrests are tossed out well before trial, and the above
is likely to be one. There won't be a conviction.
So my contention is that any images of a child in a state of nudity can
be considered child pornography.
The fact that it can be considered such by a few doesn't mean
that it will stick legally. You are making a leap, much like the one
in the Wal-Mart situation, that will not pan out, imo.
P. Tierney
|