View Single Post
  #28  
Old July 7th 03, 06:19 PM
Elizabeth Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Does "no presents" really mean that?

In article vP9Oa.56185$926.6971@sccrnsc03,
"Byron Canfield" wrote:

"Cathy Kearns" wrote in message
.com...
Miss Manners would point out that presents should never be expected,
and telling guests that normally they are expected, but not this time
by writing "no presents" on an invitation, no matter how well
intentioned, is rude. I would also presume that making disparaging
remarks about guests who could not contain their joy about their
dear friends' occasion without bringing them a token would also
be considered rude.


I suspect Miss Manners has not quite grasped the era of the Birthday Gift
Registry. If that is an indication that the rules have changed since Miss
Manners' time...



Miss Manners' time is now. Her POV, I think, would be that just because
tacky phenomena like gift registries exist, that doesn't make them
correct. I've personally given in to the concept of bridal registries,
both as a bride and as a gift giver, because the general idea of wedding
presents (if one chooses to give them) is to help the happy couple
outfit their new establishment and it seems like a practical approach
because it helps the giver determine what's most needed. But what's the
deal with birthday registries? To help kids fill out their toy
collection? I don't see any need to foster their greed further. Or to
relieve their friends of the requirement to put some thought into gift
selection.