View Single Post
  #3  
Old January 16th 11, 10:49 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med
Peter Parry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default The BIG Lie II - British Medical Journal "Clams Up" - Basic Medical Terms Unknown To Brian Deer

On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:45:38 -0000, "john" wrote:

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.c...he-big-lie-ii/


I notice it makes no attempt to explain Wakefield's business plan to
earn himself a few million dollars out of his enterprise? Why not?

They also seem to have omitted to explain that the "red book" is
filled in in part by the parents - who were involved in the
litigation Wakefield was being paid to help.

"No reasonable journal invites litigation. This suggests the BMJ is
“running scared”. "

Ah, right. Inviting someone to sue you if they think you have got it
wrong instead of wasting endless hours answering a stream of
increasingly inane questions from opponents with quasi religious
inability to see facts is "running scared"?