View Single Post
  #6  
Old December 8th 03, 05:30 AM
Kane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default | And again he barks........ Kane barks ...... again! was Kids should work...

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:23:42 -0800, Doan wrote:

I couldn't agree more! Besides, since when is calling someone
"never-spanked" is a sin? I thought it should be taken as
a compliment! ;-)

Doan


I am usually short with posters, and admonish them, who insult and
flame those obviously mentally shaky or CMI, but you'll have to excuse
me if you are, as you have me fooled. I've been taking you for normal,
in the strictly clinical sense, for most of the time until recently.
Again, if needed, my apologies.

Rather than try to weasel out of your challenge, and or to prolong the
issue, making yourself look simpler by the hour, why not just respond
to my willing offer to be humiliated by you.

You put this challenge out to me before....yet, somehow, you never
followed up on it...

"And all I have to look at is this newsgroup. Guess who is the most
obnoxious, using terms like "****", "smelly-****", "whore"? They are
the two self-proclaimed "never-spanked" persons: Steve and Kane!
"
(Excuse the embarrassing bit that refers to my using "****" when in a
later quote of you you use "****" as an ad hom. It looks patronizing,
but I was more interested in accuracy.)

and

"
Well, not unusual for a spanked child when he grows up.

How would you know? You were "never-spanked"! :-)
"

and

"And you and Steve are examples of someone who were "never-spanked"???
"

by the way, there are roughly 26 posts of these that popped up in an
archive google of posts by you with the words [never+spanked] in the
search field.

Can't say how many times per post you claimed I was "never-spanked"
but never once did you include proof of your assertion.

And you most often put it in quotes...which of course would suggest it
was my statement you were quoting.

If so, then where is your proof that I either lied or was mistaken
when I either didn't respond, or when I did and claimed mistaken that
I had not said that, or at least thought I hadn't?

Why are you shying away from this issue after YOU issued a frightfully
threatening "I DOUBLE dare you" statement?

What ever could be going through your head right now?

or...

"
Sure. At least now, we all know that you are a stupid person. Since
you can't blame it on spanking (you did claimed to be "never-spanked",
right?), it must be inherited then. ;-)
"

and...

"Wow! A perfect response from a "never-spanked" kid!!! ;-) Why is it
that whenever you openned your mouth on this newsgroup, it is "full of
****"??? :-)
"

and...

"At least I didn't claim to have been "never-spanked"! OUCH!!! ;-)"

These are coming from posts or replies and each quote is to me,
personally. And the dates are going back further and further.

"So by your claim above, you were never-spanked? ;-) C'mon, Kane9!
You are flip-flopping! Can't even keep your story straight? Sounded
like "La Moron"!!! ;-)
"

The one above was getting even further into your "Twilight Zone" as it
was a discussion of who the non-spanked and spanked might be, but I,
in our statement "by your claim above, you were never-spanked" have to
confess I made no mention in the post that I was spanked or
un-spanked, above, below, or to either side that post....so the
conclusion you drew seemed too empty to answer.

Or a part of your mind is making things up as you co along, so that
you can further your argument...whatever that is turning out to
be...ooooEEEEEooooooo....I have seen a considerably amount of what I
used to call "Third Rail Strawman" as in, "if the poster even touches
that it's going to burst into flame and zap him to eternity."

Those kinds of strawmen are the ones where the stupid poster has made
something up that is going sting him and nobody else.

I did a lot of referring to spanking in some posts to many that had
not been spanked or speculation on that possibility.

It could be you are confused.

If you have made a mistake that is perfectly alright, Doan. People,
even you, make mistakes, and there is NO reason to feel embarrassed or
discomfited. A simple acknowledgment and admission and then briskly
moving on seems to be the best response.

It will let you relax and be your sweet lovable self again. It's good
for the soul, if you are a believer, so I am told.

Or if you were correct and I erred, or you can find my words that
would show that I didn't just err, that I in fact, lied, you should
be in seventh heaven, if you are a believer, so I am told.

Either way, you win.

But not answering? Hmmmmmmm, after that "DOUBLE dare," and immediate
sincere responses by me?

Now that can start an erosion that you don't really want to continue,
do you?

Time to lay it to rest.

If you wait, even if you are correct and I am wrong, you will have
lost all the impact and folks will wonder why you suddenly screeched
to a halt and what? Contemplated your navel while posting to others
and not to me, even commenting, to someone else, about my honest and
forthright response to the challenge being somehow inappropriate, a
flame war, uninteresting to the poster you replied to instead of me?

Getting stranger and stranger, Doan, if that is possible for you.

Kane