In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote:
: On Jul 17, 12:55 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote:
: In misc.health.alternative bigvince wrote:

: : Reasoned dedate starts with some modicum of honesty

: Then why did you post that aspartame is a chlorocarbon, and why did you
: and Jan Drew separately post that screed about sucralose to which I
: provided a detailed response?

: All the postings I did refered to aspartame which I did identify
: wrongly as a chlorocarbon.

Why were you unwilling to admit to the mistake the first time that it was
pointed out to you? And why did you refuse to respond to the point that
I was making, namely, that the use of sugar and salt as preservatives is
inconsistent with the claims made that (a) anything used as a preservative
is ipso facto dangerous and (b) "natural" sugar and salt are not dangerous.

: Nowhere did I post the same as post as Jan Drew although I tend to
: agree with those postings.

You are correct; it was JOHN who posted it. I apologize for the error.

: Please post the what you refer to as a 'screed' that you falsly claim
: both I and Jan Drew posted

Jan Drew posted it twice, the second time in article
. JOHN's posting of the
screed is found in article .
My response to Jan Drew's posting may be found in article
.

: you won't you can't

I can and I did.

: We can all have opinions but there is one set of facts.

Yes, and to claim that sucralose is in the same chemical family as
chlorocarbon pesticides is factually untrue. Remember, one of us
actually has a Ph. D. in chemistry from an actual accredited university
(and that one of us is not you).

-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . . for while he was not dumber than an ox, he was not any smarter."
-- James Thurber, _My Life and Hard Times_