View Single Post
  #32  
Old October 21st 10, 11:54 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids,misc.kids.health,sci.med
dr_jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 293
Default Allopathy Inc personality traits

On 10/21/10 6:15 PM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/19/10 7:04 PM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ...

"Peter wrote in
WHY PLEOMORPHISM IS UNKNOWN TO MODERN MEDICINE

It's unknown for the same reason that miasma and humours are unknown
to modern medicine, which is that medicine has moved beyond such
ancient, meaningless ideas.



RAOFL! Pleomorphism, the correct germ theory, would kill vaccination http://whale.to/v/pleomorphism.htm

and it is telling that Pasteur was a fraud and plagarist http://whale.to/v/pasteur.html

"We must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur's vaccine, as did
uncounted people later on....Only one thing is su ever since Pasteur developed his "vaccine," the cases of death from rabies
have increased, not diminished."--Hans Ruesch

"Through a physician in Brittany, Nonclercq came across a thick tome on the history of a medicine in which she read that, on
his
death bed, Louis Pasteur had declared: Claude Bernard war right... the microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything." What
Pasteur omitted was that his confession had been based not on single insightful statement by France's leading physiologist,
Bernard, but by Antoine Béchamp, the man with whom he had been locked in struggle for decades."--Christopher Bird



"Orthodox virology omits toxicology, and is thus void. Toxicological causation is obvious and toxicology is avoided by the
media
like the plague.

What does he mean by toxicology -- that the bacteria/virus/germs emit toxins (as they do) or that the bacteria/virus/germs only
appear in response to toxins (orthopathic definition) ie the soil theory that says the germs are nothing the environment or
internal
milieu is everything?

Forget the intellectual, scientific intrigue of virology.

Yes, science has gone off on a barren tangent, except if there is madness in the method ie while it may not cure anything it does
keep people sick and reliant on drugs.


Modern medicine cures over 1/2 the people with cancer. It does wonders to improve treatment after a heart attack or stroke. It is
able to prevent blindness, kidney failure, heart attacks, stroke, and other diseases.


What is the current cancer cure rate, and which therapies achieve results?
And what about chronic disease such as asthma, allergies, diabetes, and other chronic diseases?


They are helped greatly by modern medicine. The current total cancer
cure rate is over 50%, but it depends greatly on the type of cancer and
the treatment.

You have to look this up yourself.

Jeff