"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
...

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
...

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
...

"Phil #3" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
...
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/nati...en-Beaten.html

''We looked at all the facts, and the facts at this point do not
point
to what was first being alleged,'' prosecutor
Bob Donohoo said."


"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
...
http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/jan06/389054.asp

"A mother arrested last week on allegations that she beat three
of
her
children so brutally that they sought refuge
in an abandoned home was released from jail Tuesday without
being
charged.

Milwaukee police accounts of the situation were grossly
inaccurate,
Nina Parker said in an interview Tuesday
evening, hours after her release."



Still no word about the father as in how many, who or where they
(he)
might be, how much support they (he) are or are
not paying?

Why does that matter? This is a woman who worked double shifts on
occasion, to support her family. Bob Whiteside, and
others, tried to slam this woman as some sort of abusive welfare
queen.
I've tried to show that their unfounded
accusations are precisely that - unfounded.

Perhaps the father simply abandoned, who knows?

Unfortunately, the facts are being ignored that the six oldest
children
had
already been removed from the mother's home and placed in the Child
WELFARE
System because of previous charges of abuse and neglect.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/jan06/389054.asp
"Parker said she was told by county prosecutors that all of her
children
were to be returned to her as soon as
possible."


As the result of the most recent events the other 8 children were
also
removed from her care and placed in the Child WELFARE System.

Try reading the article, she doesn't have 14 children.

I'd read the article if it didn't require me to give your source my
email
address, my home address, and other personal information just to read
it.
Surely you know you posted a source most people would ignore for privacy
reasons.

Um, actually I posted a source because it was a source.

And here is what your source said:

" Sign up.
It's fast and free.
To access JSOnline.com and OnWisconsin.com, you must be registered. Knowing
more about our audience will help us provide a better service. We appreciate
your interest in our site.

Your E-mail address:
Your gender: Female Male
Your year of birth: 19

Your street address:
(e.g. 123 Your St.) Your ZIP code:
(e.g. 53302)
Your country: United States


Already signed up?

Enter Your E-mail address:



Just enter your e-mail address above and click "GO" to view the Web site.

Encountering this form multiple times? Go to our technical support page.

Sign up for AdMail, special e-mail offers from the Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel and select advertisers.





Privacy Policy | Questions or Technical Assistance | No Spam Pledge

No Spam Pledge
We won't share your personally identifiable information with a third party
without your permission. This means you won't receive e-mails from anyone
other than the Journal Sentinel and JSOnline.com as a result of registering.


© 2006, Journal Sentinel Inc."

If you didn't read it, where did you get the fodder for your
accusations?




These
children were removed from her care because they had fresh bruises
and
scars
from abuse on their bodies. The mother was let out of jail, but the
investigation is continuing and a decision about charges will be made
later.

How can the mother be supporting these children if they are in the
child
welfare system? Do children in the Wisconsin welfare system not
receive
welfare money to support them? If the children are not being abused,
why
are the children being removed?

I can't answer those questions, because the information isn't
available.
The difference between you and I, is that you
appear more than happy, willing and eager to make accusations, when you
have no facts to support them.

When I read in other news sources the children were in the child welfare
system I understand the word's meanings and make the connection the
mother
was in the welfare system too. How difficult is that?

This is almost humour - if it was the father who had been unjustly
accused, and had his children taken away, you'd be
singing a whole different tune.

It's fine, Bob- it's quite clear that even though you try to set yourself
out there as some sort of authority, you're
simply not.