"ScottyFLL" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 4, 12:21?pm, Anna wrote:
Here is an interesting book.

Beyond Tolerance: Child Pornography on the Internet By Philip Jenkins

http://books.google.com/books?id=9tkKyuii6mgC&pg=PA82

From pages 81-82

Probably the most common type of soft-core photographs involves nude
young girls in innocent and non-sexual settings: these are the staples
of egroup trade. Many of thse images have been taken in nudist camps
or on nude beaches and they generally picture children in groups or
with their families, playing sports, or using playgrounds. If not for
the context, the scene would seem remarkably wholesome. In the whole
range of images these are the least harmful, since the photographs
were taken without causing any harm to the subjects. The material
does raise sensitive questions, however, about the nudist/naturist
subcultures and its alleged relationship to child pornography.
Particularly in North America, naturalists have long been regarded as
amiable cranks, but various activists and pressure groups have
suggested that the movement has attracted more than its share of
pedophiles and pornographers, and substantial evidence of misbehavior
comes from criminal investigtions and convictions over the years.
Without having to accept extreme charges about mass perversions in the
nudist world, the volume of nudist photography, particularly involving
small children and toddlers, does indicate that the naturist movement
has been exploited for pornographic purposes.

The nudist culture and child pornography go together. Nudists
are nothing but glorified flashers. Not the atmosphere to bring
children into.

then you are a child molester