View Single Post
  #17  
Old March 22nd 05, 03:16 AM
J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I did not know it was struck down. I think the logic in the ruling that
it was unconstitutional stated that because the formula is
fundamentally flawed and 85% of those affected are men, then it
violates equal protection.

If it was 50-50, who knows?