View Single Post
  #4  
Old July 19th 07, 07:46 AM posted to alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,alt.parenting.spanking,alt.support.foster-parents
0:-]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 805
Default obnoxious people

On 29 Dec 2006 02:54:12 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:

lostintranslation (Kim Olsen) wrote
Ok, Oscar. Does that mean that when Greg said I should get arrested in
court to challenge a law, he was in fact, breaking the law?


To be a bit technical, I did not suggest you should get arrested.
I suggested you could consider submitting the recordings of
government agents, and warned that you might need to
LITIGATE the issue. Clearly I presented that as an option
that you probably did not want to persue.


Exactly as an attorney does when giving legal advice.

You are practicing law. Without a license. Get one. Or go to jail.

I'm tired of your abuse of new comers, and successful families like
Kim's. Keep up your ****, Greg.

But based on what you and your cronies have said, you
ALREADY had the child returned and no longer needed help.


But you gave her legal advice that could easily, if she followed it,
put her children BACK in state custody.

Come on Kim, or whoever you are, it was obvious from
early on that you had a huge CHIP on your shoulder long
before I made those statements.


Based on what, little lying pig?

AND I STILL stand on the idea that privacy laws DO NOT
apply to government agents in the performance of their duty.


Then why don't YOU show up in court with the evidence YOU have broken
the law, and YOU risk going to jail and or a fine?

Do it, instead of trying to use other people as YOUR lab rat.

Any citizen, regardless of their local recording laws should
be able to record all interactions and interviews with CPS agents.


"Should," is a long way from legally can do it and not wind up paying
dearly for it.

You are, by your very argument, continuing to practice law. And bad
law at that. You'd be disbarred if you told a real legal client to get
themselves busted and risk losing their children.

EVEN if you followed with, "your choice."

And the person deciding to go with your suggestion would have
excellent grounds to SUE YOUR ass cross eyed and tie up your income
for the rest of your life, taking ALL your possessions at the
beginning for public auction to begin paying of the judgement against
you.

Missouri REQUIRES such recordings, thanks to CPSWATCH.
Several other states do as well.

One caseworker interviewing a parent in such a state recently
claimed his recorder was broken, then immediately
went to interview the child and the recording was perfect.
His recorder miraculously repaired itself!

Does that
mean that when Greg and company say, 'don't stipulate, don't do
anything on the service plan' they are giving out advice illegally?


I am not an attorney. I am also not a rutabaga.


Remember that?

Thank you for proving what I have been saying all along was right.


Greg is not only dangerous


To CPS agencies


RRRRR....WHAT'S IT COST THEM SO FAR, RUTABAGA?

REcovered even ONE child? Overturned even ONE finding..in six long
years of your babbling here?

Cost anyone their job? Discourage a worker so badly they left the
agency for good?

Guess who here HAS done these things, Greg?

And no, his name doesn't start with Greg, or Dennis. YOu can trust me
on this.

but is giving illegal advice. Good job, dear chap!


I am not a lawyer.


Greg, show your posts to a lawyer. You need help, little man.

Please find yourself "vigorous representation" if
you can.


Took the words right out of my mouth, you did.

I could not give you better legal advice myself.

Show your posts....all of them were you pretend to give advice.

Ask HIM or HER if you were giving legal advice...despite your
disclaimer.

After all, I too am not a lawyer, so YOU better not listen to me,
except for my FRIENDLY advice, to GET A LAWYER.

You are coming up on needing one. Trust me on this.

0:]