Doan lies. His goal is disruption not debate. Except for his not
leaving, he is a Usenet Troll focused on one ng.

Spanking is the subject of this ng.

Any parenting method that does not include CP IS about CP by it's
replacement.

And the Embry study is about a parenting method to teach children to
play in areas safely away from street traffic.

It does not include spanking, hence it is about alternatives to spanking.

Looking at alternatives in fact is a response to his childish screams
daring anyone to provide data and research on alternatives to spanking.

It has become increasingly clear, but possibly not to newcomers, that
Doan's idea of "debate" is nothing more than childish schoolyard bully
harassment.

He can't debate the issue, so he tries to harass those that can.

He dances about the periphery of this ng and that is all he has done for
years. His goal is obviously disruption, not debate.

I suggest we go on about our business and let he and his Texas
Troubadour continue their silly child like duet on their own.

Rather than debate Embry, he simply questions Embry as valid to this ng
and the subject of spanking.

Hypocritical.

And cowardly.

Rather than admit he cannot win, he does his screeching hysterical
monkeyboy dance.

0:-