Greegor wrote:
Kane, Can you please clarify what you hinted at?
Do you think it's OK for these Foster/Adopters to have CAGED these
kids?

Can you think of or remember a single instance where I have defended
anyone, foster, adoptive, or bio parent, for mistreating children?

Just a simple answer, not a three page rant or a filibuster.

Simple enough for you? Answer the question above.

If an actual parent had a kid or kids like this, and THEY
did this, would you back them up?

See above. And answer the question. You are insinuating again, without
proof.

Put up the proof then accuse. Just as we do with you. Evidence.

IS there a double standard when it comes to this?

From you, yes. Because you do not put these same kinds of insinuating
questions to your buddies.


Please be concise!

Concise enough for you, Ahole?

It's a Hawaiian word. Honest. Look it up.

R R R R RRRRR R R...what a pitiful piece of dreck you are.

0:-



Michael wrote:
POSTED: 7:00 am EST December 21, 2006
UPDATED: 9:05 am EST December 21, 2006
NORWALK, Ohio -- The jury in the northern Ohio "caged kids" trial will get
an early start this morning as deliberations continue into a third day.

Jurors in Norwalk are considering the child endangering and abuse charges
against Sharen and Michael Gravelle. They're accused of making some of
their 11 adopted children sleep in wood and wire cages.

The jurors deliberated about two hours Tuesday and all day Wednesday. They
got permission from the judge to resume at 7:30 a.m. Thursday --
one-and-a-half hours early.

The defense says the Gravelles made enclosed bunks to protect the special
needs youngsters from their sometimes-violent siblings.