Don't Spawn 'Em If You're Gonna Pawn 'Em
* US * wrote in message ...
...flunking ...
What you do best.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:32:14 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... difficulties ...
It's a shame that your problems result in your
impairment to the extent that you can't even
comprehend personal responsibility.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:54:24 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager
DOTnet wrote:
... it's post ...
You babble "it is post" because your unfamiliarity
with English puts you at a distinct disadvantage
in terms of learning, including learning about such
important concepts as personal responsibility.
full of
errors ...
Yes, you are. Your belief that men must be helpless
dupes unable to manage their affairs is in error, too.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:08:10 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
...a fictitious
discussion.
No one else is forcing you to lie.
Take responsibility for yourself.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:37:28 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
Believe it ...
Mere 'belief' is not a fitting substitute for reasoning.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... gone haywire ...
All the more reason for you to avoid procreation.
Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that
you can have another try if you work up the guts:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote:
Doubtful. ...
You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when
to use birth control.
Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this:
"Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation.
In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether
your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to
be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life
situation
has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of
life. Both
of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided
to
have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to
back out
of your commitment to them."
http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US.
I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the
sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate.
It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'.
I'm not certain what it
is that you think I am not controlling.
Yourself.
No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so
with a man already proven unwilling to support them.
I certainly had no control over ...
You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by
a 'father' who isn't suitable.
Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own
sequence of errors in having done that.
... her mother decided ...
You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to
pretend otherwise.
How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not?
Since he has been found to be this young ladies father
You thus disprove your false claims about the mother.
... mother who has never worked a day in her life
to support any of her children.
You don't believe that raising children is work per se?
What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your
own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces?
We had two children--the number we knew we could afford.
You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie.
You're now complaining that you can't afford it.
You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy.
decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father.
Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too.
Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that
create
a monthly late payment
Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting.
You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding)
with one well-timed advance payment.
If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out,
I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to
learn well enough to become numerate.
...Any payment made outside
the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS
Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos.
He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing,
but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental
tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
...
does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by
their methods ...
Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own
children to suffer. You can't control yourself.
... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED
as paid on time ...
If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem'
a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment.
Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner'
shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:32:14 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... difficulties ...
It's a shame that your problems result in your
impairment to the extent that you can't even
comprehend personal responsibility.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:54:24 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager
DOTnet wrote:
... it's post ...
You babble "it is post" because your unfamiliarity
with English puts you at a distinct disadvantage
in terms of learning, including learning about such
important concepts as personal responsibility.
full of
errors ...
Yes, you are. Your belief that men must be helpless
dupes unable to manage their affairs is in error, too.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:08:10 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
...a fictitious
discussion.
No one else is forcing you to lie.
Take responsibility for yourself.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:37:28 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
Believe it ...
Mere 'belief' is not a fitting substitute for reasoning.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... gone haywire ...
All the more reason for you to avoid procreation.
Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that
you can have another try if you work up the guts:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote:
Doubtful. ...
You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when
to use birth control.
Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this:
"Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation.
In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether
your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to
be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life
situation
has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of
life. Both
of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided
to
have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to
back out
of your commitment to them."
http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US.
I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the
sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate.
It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'.
I'm not certain what it
is that you think I am not controlling.
Yourself.
No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so
with a man already proven unwilling to support them.
I certainly had no control over ...
You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by
a 'father' who isn't suitable.
Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own
sequence of errors in having done that.
... her mother decided ...
You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to
pretend otherwise.
How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not?
Since he has been found to be this young ladies father
You thus disprove your false claims about the mother.
... mother who has never worked a day in her life
to support any of her children.
You don't believe that raising children is work per se?
What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your
own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces?
We had two children--the number we knew we could afford.
You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie.
You're now complaining that you can't afford it.
You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy.
decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father.
Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too.
Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that
create
a monthly late payment
Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting.
You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding)
with one well-timed advance payment.
If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out,
I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to
learn well enough to become numerate.
...Any payment made outside
the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS
Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos.
He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing,
but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental
tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
...
does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by
their methods ...
Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own
children to suffer. You can't control yourself.
... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED
as paid on time ...
If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem'
a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment.
Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner'
shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006
14:32:14 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... difficulties ...
It's a shame that your problems result in your
impairment to the extent that you can't even
comprehend personal responsibility.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:54:24 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager
DOTnet wrote:
... it's post ...
You babble "it is post" because your unfamiliarity
with English puts you at a distinct disadvantage
in terms of learning, including learning about such
important concepts as personal responsibility.
full of
errors ...
Yes, you are. Your belief that men must be helpless
dupes unable to manage their affairs is in error, too.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:08:10 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
...a fictitious
discussion.
No one else is forcing you to lie.
Take responsibility for yourself.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:37:28 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
Believe it ...
Mere 'belief' is not a fitting substitute for reasoning.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... gone haywire ...
All the more reason for you to avoid procreation.
Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that
you can have another try if you work up the guts:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote:
Doubtful. ...
You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when
to use birth control.
Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this:
"Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation.
In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether
your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to
be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life
situation
has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of
life. Both
of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided
to
have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to
back out
of your commitment to them."
http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US.
I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the
sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate.
It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'.
I'm not certain what it
is that you think I am not controlling.
Yourself.
No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so
with a man already proven unwilling to support them.
I certainly had no control over ...
You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by
a 'father' who isn't suitable.
Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own
sequence of errors in having done that.
... her mother decided ...
You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to
pretend otherwise.
How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not?
Since he has been found to be this young ladies father
You thus disprove your false claims about the mother.
... mother who has never worked a day in her life
to support any of her children.
You don't believe that raising children is work per se?
What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your
own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces?
We had two children--the number we knew we could afford.
You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie.
You're now complaining that you can't afford it.
You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy.
decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father.
Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too.
Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that
create
a monthly late payment
Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting.
You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding)
with one well-timed advance payment.
If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out,
I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to
learn well enough to become numerate.
...Any payment made outside
the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS
Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos.
He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing,
but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental
tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
...
does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by
their methods ...
Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own
children to suffer. You can't control yourself.
... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED
as paid on time ...
If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem'
a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment.
Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner'
shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006
14:32:14 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... difficulties ...
It's a shame that your problems result in your
impairment to the extent that you can't even
comprehend personal responsibility.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:54:24 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager
DOTnet wrote:
... it's post ...
You babble "it is post" because your unfamiliarity
with English puts you at a distinct disadvantage
in terms of learning, including learning about such
important concepts as personal responsibility.
full of
errors ...
Yes, you are. Your belief that men must be helpless
dupes unable to manage their affairs is in error, too.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:08:10 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
...a fictitious
discussion.
No one else is forcing you to lie.
Take responsibility for yourself.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:37:28 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
Believe it ...
Mere 'belief' is not a fitting substitute for reasoning.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... gone haywire ...
All the more reason for you to avoid procreation.
Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that
you can have another try if you work up the guts:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote:
Doubtful. ...
You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when
to use birth control.
Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this:
"Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation.
In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether
your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to
be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life
situation
has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of
life. Both
of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided
to
have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to
back out
of your commitment to them."
http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US.
I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the
sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate.
It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'.
I'm not certain what it
is that you think I am not controlling.
Yourself.
No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so
with a man already proven unwilling to support them.
I certainly had no control over ...
You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by
a 'father' who isn't suitable.
Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own
sequence of errors in having done that.
... her mother decided ...
You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to
pretend otherwise.
How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not?
Since he has been found to be this young ladies father
You thus disprove your false claims about the mother.
... mother who has never worked a day in her life
to support any of her children.
You don't believe that raising children is work per se?
What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your
own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces?
We had two children--the number we knew we could afford.
You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie.
You're now complaining that you can't afford it.
You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy.
decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father.
Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too.
Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that
create
a monthly late payment
Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting.
You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding)
with one well-timed advance payment.
If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out,
I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to
learn well enough to become numerate.
...Any payment made outside
the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS
Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos.
He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing,
but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental
tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
...
does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by
their methods ...
Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own
children to suffer. You can't control yourself.
... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED
as paid on time ...
If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem'
a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment.
Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner'
shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually. On Sat, 28 Jan 2006
14:32:14 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... difficulties ...
It's a shame that your problems result in your
impairment to the extent that you can't even
comprehend personal responsibility.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:54:24 -0500, "P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager
DOTnet wrote:
... it's post ...
You babble "it is post" because your unfamiliarity
with English puts you at a distinct disadvantage
in terms of learning, including learning about such
important concepts as personal responsibility.
full of
errors ...
Yes, you are. Your belief that men must be helpless
dupes unable to manage their affairs is in error, too.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:08:10 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
...a fictitious
discussion.
No one else is forcing you to lie.
Take responsibility for yourself.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:37:28 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
Believe it ...
Mere 'belief' is not a fitting substitute for reasoning.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:00:33 -0800, "Chris" wrote:
... gone haywire ...
All the more reason for you to avoid procreation.
Here's the info you can't seem to process, so that
you can have another try if you work up the guts:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:41:05 GMT, "Gini" wrote:
Doubtful. ...
You sure are, if you can't even learn how and when
to use birth control.
Perhaps you can't even learn how to read this:
"Before copping an attitude about child support, consider the situation.
In this modern world, you can have sex without reproducing. So, whether
your children were intentional, or accidental, your actions caused them to
be here. It isn't their fault they were born. And, the fact that your life
situation
has changed should have as little impact as possible on their quality of
life. Both
of you made a financial, as well as an emotional decision when you decided
to
have kids. Now that they are here, it is too late for either of you to
back out
of your commitment to them."
http://www.divorcenet.com/states/indiana/in_art04
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:48:07 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
You would haveto explain your reasoning here, US.
I've stated the facts plainly enough. If you're just not the
sharpest tool in the shed you sure shouldn't procreate.
It's rather unsettling to imagine that you'd be a 'teacher'.
I'm not certain what it
is that you think I am not controlling.
Yourself.
No one forced you to have kids at all, much less to do so
with a man already proven unwilling to support them.
I certainly had no control over ...
You can't control yourself. You got pregnant carelessly, by
a 'father' who isn't suitable.
Now you want to gripe about nothing more than your own
sequence of errors in having done that.
... her mother decided ...
You don't speak for her. It's disingenuous for you to try to
pretend otherwise.
How could you teach a child to be honest when you're not?
Since he has been found to be this young ladies father
You thus disprove your false claims about the mother.
... mother who has never worked a day in her life
to support any of her children.
You don't believe that raising children is work per se?
What do you do, lie on the couch eating bonbons as your
own neglected spawn rot in their own urine and feces?
We had two children--the number we knew we could afford.
You didn't know that. He didn't know that. You lie.
You're now complaining that you can't afford it.
You made the mistake. Don't beg for sympathy.
decisions were made by others that deprived her of a father.
Obviously the father cut out. He'll do it to you, too.
Uh--I don't think you really understand the accounting practices that
create
a monthly late payment
Actually, I'm well qualified in accounting.
You beat that system (intentionality notwithstanding)
with one well-timed advance payment.
If you're too arithmetically impaired to figure that out,
I hope your kids can find someone else from whom to
learn well enough to become numerate.
...Any payment made outside
the wage garnishment would not be counted as current CS
Try learning about the contractual nature of check memos.
He could be better off settling the arrearage via financing,
but considering that your temporary spouse hasn't the mental
tackle to manage basic birth control, that may be beyond him.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:14:35 -0800, "teachrmama"
wrote:
...
does not give a rat's tookus if other children are forced into poverty by
their methods ...
Yes, you don't care that your 'methods' cause your own
children to suffer. You can't control yourself.
... the payments garnished from my husband's wages are NOT COUNTED
as paid on time ...
If you weren't really stupid, you could've solved that 'problem'
a long time ago, with but one extra properly-timed payment.
Those as unintelligent as you and your temporary 'partner'
shouldn't be permitted to procreate, actually.
|