"Mike" wrote in message
...
Peter B wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message
...
Peter Parry wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:54:35 -0000, "john" wrote:

No, just the 600 from the 1976 scam, a pretty notorius example
So why were these 600 different from the 600 before and the 600
after?
Where did you get the number 600 for 1977 and after?

The issue is that the incidence of GBS was significantly higher
among those who got a swine flu jab in 1976.
So much higher that it could be admitted in court as evidence.
There were numerous vaccine injury claims, some were accepted,
about $13M has been paid.

Provide independent proof please or should it just be considered
hearsay?
http://www.globalsecurity.org/securi...demic-1976.htm

That link is not related to your comments, it was not proof. All it does
is show your statements were totally unfounded.