View Single Post
  #20  
Old November 13th 10, 05:24 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,alt.health,misc.kids.health
carole
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 251
Default Bob Officer is nonsense - was pure blood


"Bob Officer" -*-*.@.*-*- wrote in message ...
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:12:16 +1100, in misc.health.alternative,
"carole" wrote:


"Bob Officer" -*-*.@.*-*- wrote in message ...
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 12:45:10 +1100, in misc.health.alternative,
"carole" wrote:


"Bob Officer" -*-*.@.*-*- wrote in message ...
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:34:04 +1100, in misc.health.alternative,
"carole" wrote:


"Bob Officer" -*-*.@.*-*- wrote in message ...
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 06:47:12 +1100, in misc.health.alternative,



The truth about the Rockefeller drug empire
The Drug Story - by Hans Ruesch
www.think-aboutit.com/health/TheDrugStory.htm

cite

Originally web posted at:
http://www.eurosolve.com/charity/bava/story.htm

DISCLAIMER:
I make no claims for the accuracy of this information and express
no personal opinion on the matter. The information was acquired off
the web and from authors (owners of said pages) and other sources and
described as "information" and I wanted to pass it along to anyone
who might find it interesting or otherwise useful.
/cite


Interesting the original poster is no longer available so there is no
way to test the veracity of the web site you are citing.

So how do we know this "story" is true? What are the facts and what
parts are fiction. Since the author produces nothing but his own say
so. we must discount the entire sections of claims which do not have
evidence to back the claims.


Refute this -

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21984950/T...i-a-Bealle-PDF

Still not one bit of evidence (like a letter or note from
Rockefeller) of anyone trying to exert control.

I read this last time it was posted. IT isn't evidence. It is a story
with a few facts here and there. much like the Video link you posted.

The odd thing is you claimed to have studied logic, It doesn't show.
You claim to be a mastermind, that doesn't show either.
You have even claimed to have higher than normal intelligence, and
that doesn't show.

But bob, I am an INTJ - equivalent to Keirsey's mastermind, while you being an ESTJ are equivalent to
Keirsey's supervisor.

Mere-say, and not evidence in the way you behave.

And guess what bob, ESTJ isn't listed as one of the rational types.

And who would be the ESTJ? Are you guessing?

IT really doesn't matter because the premise behind the Personality
Typing is false. Personality type is not fixed, therefore the test
and any claims based on the results are nonsense at best.


Methinks you protest too much.


So have you ever been retested, Carole. Afraid to see that
personality typing premise is based on false hope?


I can identify with the characteristics of the INTJ personality type.
It has been quite empowering for me learn my type and why I am different from some others who like to bully me
into thinking their way.


What does show is your are closed minded, ignorant and proud of the
your ignorance, personally biased for some reason against all forms
of education and you don't seem to be able to think in a rational
manner.

No, bob I am proud of the fact I don't take myself as seriously as you seem to take yourself.

that is your ignorance speaking Carole. We can see the lie you just
typed and is isn't funny.


Lighten up blob ...life's too short.


It is and no matter how short it is you seem to hell bent on "being
made an idiot out of .."

It also shows you have a problem with preconceived notions and have
an odd belief system. You also hate all men, for some reason. Most of
the time you post as if you have been drinking or smoking pot. You
have some sever short term memory problems and can not remember from
day to day or week to week what has been posted or discussed.

I don't hate men, I hate the behaviour. We live in a patriarchal society where men dominate in all forms
of
business, government and organisations of any significance and women are treated as chattels for men's
convenience and pleasure.

Not supported by Evidence.


No, none at all ...to those who wear blinkers.


You say "men", is that all inclusive? You blindly skip over the fact
very few men are hell bent on being dominate. This is important you
just ignore, An equal number of women are equally dominate given an
equal opportunity.


Its not against men per se but the patriarchal culture -- I realise most men aren't intent on dominating, and
that many women would if they could.
The culture of patriarchy is the issue - and its an insidious culture that has ruled all of western society
until more recently.
Best explained in the article -

Capitalist Patriarchy and The Negation of Matriarchy
http://www.newparadigmjournal.com/Oc...patriarchy.htm


--
Carole
www.conspiracee.com
Bob Officer finally admits it -"I am a tool"
http://groups.google.com.au/group/mi...ss+epidemic%22