View Single Post
  #1435  
Old October 21st 06, 11:53 PM posted to alt.child-support,can.legal,can.politics,soc.men
teachrmama
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,905
Default Low Income Fathers, Child Support and Economic Oppression


"Moon Shyne" wrote in message
...

"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"?-?" wrote in message
. com...

"teachrmama" wrote in

Yes, as a matter of fact. It may look good on paper, but it just isn't
done that way. When my husband went to court to have CS set for the
daughter he had just found out about, the judge told him that his other
children were irrelevant.

Funny, I was just told by immigration that lack of CS payments to my
child would not cause any hardship for her and I am to leave the
country. How does this work?


I don't know about your case. In my husband's case, he was told that the
almost-13-year-old he had just found out about was the only one the
courts would look at in setting CS--and that our 2 daughters were
irrelevant to how much $$$ he would be assigned to pay.


When are you going to accept that not only are subsequent children
irrelevant in CS cases for prior children, but subsequemnt wives/husbands
are, too?

Unless you think that when the CP has more children, the CS should go up?


What on earth are you talking about, Moon?