Greegor wrote:
Greegor wrote:
Would Dan Sullivan advise the family to COOPERATE
with this sort of an assenine witch hunt?

Kane wrote
I don't know. But my best guess is, no.

In fact I don't "advise" them to either, as it would be bad legal advice
if I were giving it as such, and as non-legal advice I don't think one
should, guilty or innocent, forget that it's innocent until proven
guilty in this country.

That all SOUNDS nice, but was it you or Ron who
explained that caseworkers are actually trained on
how to CON their way into such homes?

Neither. You might want to rephrase your question though.

No "conning" takes place.

Especially considering the disproportionate number
of lower income families targeted,

They get reported more, and more often do more neglect...something more
dangerous than all the other abuses put together, for fatalities.
Notice?

are you
going to pretend that everybody has a "Dream Team"
or an attorney like Klicka to fend off such crap?

Nope. That's life. Shall we not arrest, charge, and try bank robbers
based on their inability to afford top lawyers?

The old "all the justice you can buy" thing is not
an acceptable answer, is it?

Nope, but it's the truth.

And your solution would be........................?

R R RRR RRRR You've never answered my question.

Just how stupid ARE you, Greg?