On 13 Feb 2006 09:37:59 -0800, "SpiderHam77"
wrote:

I agree with Snowshoe here... The time factor alone... over 6 years
of Custody.. gives you whats known as Defacto Custody if nothing has
ever been written on paper about the Custody. Meaning that the courts
are not going to just upset the balance of the Children's lives, based
on the fact that Mommy now wants them...

I can't imagine any court ever doing such a thing. 6 years is a long
time... And if there have been no complications up until now.. why
would the courts step in an intervine. I find the people who are so
against the courts and how rulings are made, are the ones who have had
a ruling made against them, and not the way they wanted it to go.

SpiderHam77

I can't imagine any court granting unsupervised visitation to a child
molester either, but I've seen it done. By the way, the same judge
signed an order concerning the same family just three years earlier
which identified the man as a child molester (he admitted to being
one). Granted, the judge was dying from brain cancer at the time, but
that did not affect the enforceability of her rulings.
Beverly