On 6 Mar 2007 06:31:00 -0800, "Firemonkey"
wrote:

Are you not reading what everyone is saying about you Piggy?
You and the other fools are the ones we are all laughing at.
I log on here several times a day just to watch Kane
out reason you. I would guess others do the same
and we laugh and laugh.
Keep talking piggy.

WHAT!? What did you SAY?

"Out reason," him?

Heavens to Betsy, woman, I haven't even started to 'reason' yet.

With the disabled but misbehaving I try to stick, humanely, to just
being patient and firm.

R R RR R R RRR R RR R

Ken, where is that proof and evidence you keep harping on?

It is unethical to define conditions outside the boundaries of the
very discipline you wish to argue within.

And it's more unethical to make an assertive claim, then duck by foul
means, a request to provide what you claim exists.

"There is NO scientifically acceptable evidence that spanking causes
aggression in Children. There is considerable evidence that a lack of
spanking can produce sociopathy in children. "

When questioned about the first statement above, "There is NO
scientifically acceptable evidence that spanking causes
aggression in Children," and what you considered "scientifically
acceptable evidence," you weaseled by setting up conditions that the
scientific community does not.

If you cannot accept standard protocols for scientific inquiry, please
say so. If you cannot, then your attempts to support a claim of your
own rests on air, hot at that.

Standard understanding of scientific research in the social science
field...as that IS where we argue.

That leaves you in something of a precarious position on your claim,
"There is considerable evidence that a lack of spanking can produce
sociopathy in children," if you insist you will not use the standards
of social science research, and instead claim cause and our
interesting description of a medical style experiment that would
require animals rather than humans be used. With humans your model
would be unethical.

So how would you like to sort this out, Ken?

Other than some more screaming dodges, that is?

One standard for all arguments. Yours, or the standard social science
one, and both arguments apply.

And you come up with proof of my claiming "spanking causes aggression
in children," and your evidence of sociopathy.

Deal?

Or run. Your choice.

I'm still here, still patiently waiting.

You might, before you think you can outlast me, have a chat with Greg,
or do a google on his and my posting history, about a conversation he
had with a cop, the issue of using lethal force against CPS workers,
and the Christine case.

He too thought he could outlast me. He didn't.

You can run, but, Ken, you cannot hide.

alt.parenting.spanking, alt.support.foster-parents,
alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,
soc.men






On Mar 6, 7:31 am, "KRP" wrote:
"0:-]" wrote in message

...

FRANTIC PLEA FOR HELP FROM THE STALKER!!
PLEASE DAVEY MOORE HELP KANE!

OH POOR KANE IS LOSING

Come on Kane BEG for Moore! PLEASE PLEASE HELP KANE! EMERGENCY! Kane is
losing.
Post the about KEN web address again PLEASE HELP KANE he's DESPERATE!

You don't honestly think that has the least effect on me or fools
anyone that's been following our exchange, do you? titter

Sure it does you dance to my tune fool. You keep adding the dads group and
now that I am ridiculing you for the PANSY you are, you are desperately
adding soc.men now to alert Moore as to how badly you need his help. What a
sad LITTLE man you are Kane. What a desperate little LOSER.

PLEASE PLEASE DAVID MOORE COME HELP ME PLEASE PLEASE I A, CONTACTING YOU ON
ALL HAILING FREQUENCIES.
HELP HELP HELP SOS SOS MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY HELP HELP HELP HELP.

Kane if you think that people are reading this any other way than your
desperation to get Moore's help you're delusional. It is what you are doing.
You know it, you think you can fool people, but you merely insult their
intelligence. Nobody is fooled by your silly ****. Everyone knows you are
desperately seeking Moore's help.

I'm sitting here laughing my ass off at you Kane. You're PATHETIC!