View Single Post
  #16  
Old December 13th 03, 09:52 AM
Dan Sullivan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default | Most hostile member this NG? Most insults, emot. abuse


"Greg Hanson" wrote in message
om...
"Dan Sullivan" wrote in message

.net...
"Ignoramus6098" wrote in message
...

Very interesting Dan. How come they were so intent to go after you?


When a report is accepted by the CPS hotline by law they have to
investigate.


Incorrect. A report can be screened out if the reporter
has a history of harassing reports.


I said "when a report is accepted" that means it was screened in.

This can even be done
if the calling center is ignorant of the case, which they
often seem to be, but which violates another requirement.

A report can be screened out or severely devalued
for motivated reporters, axe to grind etc.


A CPS report can be "severely devalued???"

Citations please.

There is not a robotic requirement to make a big deal
about every bogus report, in fact if they operate that
way they are in noncompliance and violating family
civil rights.

However, more reports is good for agency budgetary reasons.

I had no problem with that.

But when it became apparent my caseworker didn't
know what he was talking about based on the
info sent to me by CPS I did some research on
CPS' rules and regulations at my local library.

It didn't take long to realize that I knew
more about their rules and regulations
than the CW did.


This is true. It doesn't take much to
be more knowledgeable than a caseworker.


You aren't referring to yourself, Greg, are you?

CPS "founded" the reports when they thought
they'd get away with it... not by the
evidence but because someone, a supervisor
or administrator, told the CW to make
that determination.


That's a pattern repeated over and over
across the entire USA, probably internationally.
As I said, it's good for their budget.

I hope that your relationship with
your kid did not suffer.

Who submitted a report about you
slapping your child on the no
visitation day? Your ex?


All the reports were made by or instigated
by a bi-polar relative who claimed that
they could tell by someone's face if they
were a child abuser or not.


You have OTHER bipolar relatives besides your ex?

And that incest happens not because the
parent wants to have sex with the child,
but because the child wants to have sex
with the parent.


Interesting nutty accusation, but you said
earlier that CPS had to investigate every
accusation?


Did I say "every accusation?"

I draw your attention to this.
This persons report should have been SCREENED OUT.


This accusation was made during the investigation of an earlier report.

I forced the CW to resign from government service.

I got my case record on a Friday and Monday the CW was saying good-bye to
all her "clients."

I found out because one of her other "clients" was a family I was helping
and they called to tell me the news.

Instead caseworkers took it and RAN with it.
This idiot's report should never have been
screened IN at the calling center.


Subsequent report in an ongoing investigation.