View Single Post
  #18  
Old December 13th 03, 03:46 PM
Dan Sullivan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default | Most hostile member this NG? Most insults, emot. abuse


"guyontheporch" wrote in message
s.com...


Dan Sullivan wrote:

"Ignoramus6098" wrote in message
...

Very interesting Dan. How come they were so intent to go after you?



When a report is accepted by the CPS hotline by law they have to
investigate.

I had no problem with that.

But when it became apparent my caseworker didn't know what he was

talking
about based on the info sent to me by CPS I did some research on CPS'

rules
and regulations at my local library.

It didn't take long to realize that I knew more about their rules and
regulations
than the CW did.

CPS "founded" the reports when they thought they'd get away with it...

not
by the evidence but because someone, a supervisor or administrator, told

the
CW to make that determination.


I hope that your relationship with your kid did not suffer.

Who submitted a report about you slapping your child on the no
visitation day? Your ex?



All the reports were made by or instigated by a bi-polar relative who
claimed that they could tell by someone's face if they were a child

abuser
or not.

And that incest happens not because the parent wants to have sex with

the
child, but because the child wants to have sex with the parent.

My daughter was three when I was accused of molesting her.


Think she will ever understand why you touched her like that and then

lied?

As I've posted before, the SA expert that CPS used to investigate the
accusation wrote in her report to the Court that my children were the
"foundation of my life," that there was no evidence I had done anything
inappropriate to my children and that CPS should be investigating my
accuser.

Thanks for asking... I love posting how the Family Court petition got thrown
out of court.

Not many people have a Family Court document that says their children are
the "foundation of their life?"

How 'bout you Dennis?