On 6 Apr 2004, Kane wrote:

On 6 Apr 2004 18:59:34 -0700, (Alina) wrote:

(Kane) wrote in message om...

I do? I forget if I mentioned the size in the ng. text attachment
wouldn't be very large.

You did :-) http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...g.goog le.com


Yep, and 80 pages in a text document, even with some simple charts
would hardly be a load for an e-mail.

This is a 180 degrees turn from:

"I hope Gerald and "Alina" have a high speed connection to the
internet. That's a lot of graphics to send."

I had made the offer to anyone he and I both knew in the ng. That's
why I was questioning sending it to you. He could know you, or even be
you, and intercept it and pretend all along he had it. His veracity
has been questioned many times here.

LOL! This is a contradiction to the claim by Kane:

"My research skills are formidable, as some twits here have found out the
hard way."

Come on, Kane! You are either a very bad LIAR or very STUPID! ;-)

Doan