"Greegor" wrote in message
...
Ron buddy
Let me ask you a question. Have you even looked at my site? Have you
ever even seen it? Do you have any idea of the work I've done on it,
the research I've put into it or of the knowledge I actually do have
about the things that are going on in the system? Do you even
remotely have a clue as to how the system is failing children and
families? Have you been following allong with the current events
regarding child protective and foster care at all lately? Do you know
about the major overhauls of DHS in some states or how Oaklahoma,
Micigan and Oregon are all currently being sued by a major childrens
rights groups? Did you know that they are trying to change things so
that a foster child doesn't age out of the system until age 21 instead
of 18, becasue lots of kids just aren't ready to be on their own at
18? Do you really know what's going on in the system? Or are you
just spewing **** out of your mouth like a typicol foster contractor
who is trying to keep himself in a job, without actually knowing a
goddamn thing based on a single set of facts that tells nothing of any
debth such as severity of the abuse suffered comparitavely amongst
these children etc? Because there are all kinds of facts on my site
Ron, sources all cited. Hundreds of links with lots and lots and lots
of facts and stories and studies and reports. My site goes a lot
deeper into the system and how it works and the damage it has caused
to children and families then anything you have ever done or said or
would admit to or discussed in this group. So here it is Ron

http://www.LegallyKidnapped.blogspot.com

go check it out, look at how
ALL of my sources are all cited. Watch some of the videos. Read some
of the stories, etc. Spend a little bit of time there. Lets see if
you really have an "open mind" like you claim you do. Check and see
how you have to go to the original sources to read the entire articles
etc. Then come back and spew your bull**** about your facts all you
want, but don't try to tell me that I don't know what I'm talking
about without seeing for yourself what I am talking about. Hell Ron,
I'd even invite you to leave a comment, so you can prove that you've
been there. Leave your honest opinion in the comments section
regarding anything I've posted to my blog. Then lets compair my facts
to yours.

G Do you have any good lessons for Ron about RATIOS?

BW Greg, I'd like to ask you, are you impressed
BW with Les' edu-ma-cation?

G His name is not Les.
G You can't even call him by the right name.

BW I choose to call him Les, and he has
BW no complaints about it. Why do you care?

Goes to your credibility.

***Such as when you call me by names that aren't mine, accuse me of being in
a profession I am not?


G "The beginning of all wisdom is getting
G things by their right name." Confucious

BW Do you really believe that Les is someone
BW capable of giving anyone else a 'lesson'?
BW Is that 'typicol' of your opinion?

G Are you confusing spelling errors with ignorance?

BW Hoooo-kay...so what would YOU call
BW someone who can't communicate in
BW their own language?

Are you talking about bureaucratese or agency speak?

Or are you pretending that spelling a few words
wrong makes him inferior, especially to you?

****I'm not 'pretending' anything. I was simply pointing to either lack of
intelligence or lack of education.
Surely it's simply one or the other.

BW At least KRP's litter posts are obviously
BW typoes. I think if Ron could learn something,
BW anything, from someone else, he'd pick
BW someone with a little more basic intelligence
BW and a whole lot of personal experience.

G Exactly why "LK" is qualified in that regard.

BW So, Les is a foster parent then?

Tell me, Betty, do you REALLY think that
bureaucracy is the only experience that counts?

****What experience, specifically, qualifies Les to judge?
Be precise, I wouldn't want to miss it.
If it's even remotely like your experience as a parent then this should be
good.