If you argue that your spouse is unfit because her own pleadings and actions
try to minimize vice maximize your time with the children while your
pleadings ask for maximum involvement of both parents, you place your spouse
in a legal box. She will either increase her offers or look foolish trying
to explain to a cross examiner why she should have more time with the
children than you and would run a serious risk of losing or not obtaining
custody. Either way, you better your position and minimize emotional damage
to the children. Even if you don't win custody, you will enjoy much more
visitation than fathers usually are awarded.

"fathersrights" wrote in message
...
Case law is what was quoted in the original post. Common sense confirms
the courts ruling that you cant make a logical case to deny a parent the
RIGHT to babysit over third parties.
"Relayer" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Apr 6, 8:44?pm, "fathersrights" wrote:
Me thinks you protest too much. If the materials weren't effective you
feminists wouldnt hate them so much. You totally neglect all the FREE
help
for fathers available at http://www.fathersrights.org;And fathers,if you
think custody law doesn"t control in custody cases, no wonder you lost
your
case."Gini" wrote in message

news:QBrQh.2833$gb6.2603@trndny07...





"Chris" wrote

"fathersrights" wrote
................

NOT when the custodial parent is the mother.
==
Chris, fathersrights is a long time scammer/spammer who is a for-profit
peddler
of worthless crap to NCPs. If you feel compelled to engage him, please
at
least
trim his posts to as not to perpetuate his BS.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

999/1000 times custody is decided by case law, not state statute.