On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:35:19 -0700, Greegor
wrote:

G The guy had some qualms with the communications
G the Public Relations Spin Doctors wrote!

K Seems he thinks if his name is on something
K he has some right to review it first.
K Does that seem strange or corrupt to you?

It's HILARIOUS that he has to assert rights
to his own name in the face of the state's
spin doctors writing crap FOR him!

No rhyme nor reason to your statement.

If your name is signed to something do you not have the right to have
actually seen it yourself and passed judgement and have editorial
control over it?

Shall I write something for you? 0:]

And publish it without you approving it first?

I have a little statement of yours that I could compose on the
effectiveness or lack thereof of teaching little girls not to wet
themselves.

It's okay with you if I write it, and send it to the editor of your
local paper, before you see it, right?

Do you think it hilarious that YOU might like to assert your rights
for editorial control of what "you" have your name signed to?

K YOu do seem to approve of krp rewriting

As per your comment below. How is that statement above, of mine, a
lie?
K other's posts in various creative ways and
K pretending they said something they didn't.

As per your comment below. How is that statement above, of mine, a
lie?

You can't really be claiming krp tells the truth about other peoples
posted comments, could you?

K It seems you celebrate lying, Greg. Why is that I wonder?

Will you answer my question?

Kane, you are nothing but lies. Nothing to celebrate.

No, apparently not.

Tell you what, how about you list some of my "lies" right here, and
I'll explain again what I was stating, and provide proof.

You've been lying since your first post to this newsgroup, Greg. You
hedged around your convictions for domestic abuse until it was
revealed that you indeed had two of them and did TIME for them.

Details of your encounter with g'pa, with CPS, with Lisa's daughter,
all changed over time, Greg.

Why is that I wonder?

Other than you an habitual liar.

Just as you lie above, if you are attempting to claim that krp doesn't
lie.

0:]