Greegor wrote:
In response to a Federal Judges RULING
Kane wrote
... without closely reading this case and the
judges opinion. And once again not applying
logic to a case and the opinions.

Much of this is a joke. A long rambling
political manifesto rather than a thoughtful ruling.

How many other judges would take this seriously?

It's funny you should mention that, because when
this judge went to apply an order for Federal Court
supervision regarding the abuses, she found that
another Federal judge had ALREADY put the agency
under one ten years before, which the agency
basically ignored.

Neither Judge knew about the other's findings
until then.

Which would devastate my argument if it actually answered my question.

You love it, of course, just like you and others
here have done in the past with this and
other cases where you THINK this has great
meaning that it indeed does not.

PLEASE keep thinking that!

No, I'll think what I believe to be the facts. Thanks.

You cherry pick, even leaving out the context
that relates to a statement. Very sad, and
very much the tactics of liars.

I posted what I got, the only editing I did was
to remove page numbers.

Yep. You couldn't figure out I was referring to past instances?

Odd.

It's a public document, please feel free to
post the entirety!

The one you posted is fine.

I presume this is in rebuttal to my subject
line, and not the case of the rat bitten infant.

Can you find a rat bite case newer than 2 years old?

Mmm...that one was.

How much more recent are you looking for?

"Thursday, May 4, 2006 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

E-mail article Print view

Rat bites 6-month-old 100-200 times

By The Associated Press"

Otherwise I would chalk it up to revealing the
real RATS, who fraud up cases for CPS.

Rather than deal with the issue in the article you posted a shot at CPS.

Why is that, greegor?

In fact, why do you do that so often?

It makes it appear as though you don't care about the children, and in
this case, the rat bitten child. Have you any idea how dangerous rat
bites are?

ONE bite is enough. Even having a wild caught rat in proximity to
children (or adults) is dangerous. Heard of the "Hantavirus?" Just read
of yet another death from it recently. Nasty way to die too.

http://tinyurl.com/h57qj

So please show us where anything in this
decision below indicates we do not need
CPS. Thanks.

Busybodies hysterically turning loose their
fertive and perverted imaginations as if they
are professional anythings?

The request was to SHOW, not talk about. Cite a portion of the decision
you posted to SHOW us it indicates we do not have a need for CPS.

Or tell us that is NOT why you posted the decision. Either way would be
a service. Time you started paying your way here for all the indulgence
we give you.

All to enforce prosecution of non-crimes?

What non-crimes would that be?

The ones found only after a court case to not be prosecutable?

If we did not prosecute unless we already KNEW a crime had been
committed we would never investigate a crime.

Would you like that? Just waiting for the day?

Who needs that?

Certainly not the kids.

Certainly you are wrong.

Did it help the Dupuy kids?
The Wallis kids?
Shelby Duis?
Rilya Wilson?

Now give us the list of children that have been helped by CPS and court
intervention.

You cannot of course, because they have privacy that protects their
names, but you know, as well as anyone, that in fact the list is
considerably longer.

Hundreds of thousands per year.

Nice chatting with you.

Now getting back to the article I posted: do you approve of a family
bringing a wild caught rat into the home to sleep in the same room with
the baby and failing to secure it so that it got out and bit the child
over a hundred times?

Should they NOT subject to legal interventions?

If not, why not?

You may wish to discuss these other things instead, and I'd be happy to
in another thread, as I have many times in the past (you ARE a redundant
little puppy aren't you now?) but I posted THIS article and expect THIS
article to be discussed. If you do not wish to, fine.

Others might.

Or you can answer the question above.

You'll note I try to answer every question of yours, yet you, in your
unethical and immoral way refuse to answer so very many of mine. Even
ones that are not the least personal.

0:-
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin