View Single Post
  #17  
Old June 18th 04, 02:39 PM
Bob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CS and women's greed strikes again..

Don wrote:
This case is no different from any other miscarriage of justice perpetrated
against fathers. Parents should automatically have shared parenting with no
child support changing hands.


Close but no cigar. Dads should automatically have authority over our
children, as fathers have had for the past 100,000 years before
feminazism. Children raised by mothers turn out worse by every
measurable criteria. Fathers do know best.


If any parent is unable or unwilling to do
such and there is to be some form of child support then it should only be
for basic expenses. Anything above and beyond is lifestyle support which
should be up to the parents to decide lifestyle expenses just like it is for
intact families.


The whole concept of "child support" is a radical feminist experiment
that has hurt untold millions of children. It is a travesty and engine
of inhuman suffering, and ought to be forgotten.

You can't do good by doing wrong more effectively. Any form of
"absentee child support" is wrong.

Bob




--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/