View Single Post
  #22  
Old December 7th 07, 01:06 PM posted to misc.kids
Stephanie[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 693
Default Rewarding good or "not bad"


"Beliavsky" wrote in message
...
On Dec 6, 5:10 pm, "Stephanie" wrote:

snip

I wonder what difference it makes what the other kids are doing.
(PollyAnna!!) But really, the notion of goals and acheivement *should* be
personal. Right now I am working on X. I want to achieve Y. How is my
progress...


I think there is a sex difference such that males are more motivated
by competition than females are, on average. Many educators, such as
those in the OP's school, frown on competition nowadays, and this may
be partly explain why boys have fallen behind girls in academic
achievement. Christina Hoff Sommers discussed this in a book "The War
Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men".



That does not really speak to the necessity for *personal* goals and the
importance of basing acheivement on THAT vs on what your neighbor is doing.

I don't have any particular problem with competitiveness. But I think
children should be able to choose how they compete in the form of academic
clubs, sports and the like. For those who are not competitive, competition
in acedamia can be very harmful.

I would not, personally, look to a book with such an incindiary title for
meaningful, unbiased judgements. I believe that boys are failed in many ways
by our schools. I also think girls are failed in many ways by our schools.

I've seen otherwise intelligent men on trading floors engage in eating/
drinking contests. I doubt a group of women would do that.

I know I was a fairly competitive student by high school -- I didn't
just want A's but to be the top student in every individual class. I
did not succeed in the latter, but the goal may have motivated me to
work harder than I otherwise would have.