Ken Pangborn reneges on word
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 0:- wrote:
On 17 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:
Who is this ""Coalition"" really?
Is it one guy pretending to be many?
Dennis Deakin?
Michael?
On Feb 16, 3:47 pm, Anonyma wrote:
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm).
Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.
On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.
On Feb 16, 3:52 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed
wrote:
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 23, 3:52 pm)
Last month Ken Pangborn approached a member of the Coalition and basically
begged us to stop humiliating him on usenet. He agreed to privately
retract some of his lies about others, and to cease his usenet activity.
On the first item, he has only partially complied....sending out a couple
of e-mails with vague "my source may have lied to me" excuses. On the
second, he is now breaking his vow of silence in soc.culture.cuba.
Looks like your puppy is taking a whippin' Greg. Think he'll thank you
for your introduction to me?
R R R RRR R R R RR R
He's the same kind of fool and liar you are, Greg.
Hihihi! Still foaming at the mouth, Kane? He whipped your ass at
debating so bad you had to concede!
Doan
|