In article , "Dan says...


"Banty" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...


The short of it is that I simply don't give a **** about your delicate
sensibilities, r.e. smoking.

Get a life.

I have one.

Yours, on the other hand, you've taken upon yourself to endanger.

Is that it? Is that the best you can do? A little originality *please*. Of
all the tired, worn out phrases to choose from, you have to show yourself to
be among the most unoriginal cliche quoting self righteous idiots.

Who's trying for a prize in originality?? *Why* should your respondants be
trying to be original??

There's a reason why you're reading the same thing over and over in responses to
your posts on this subject. Of course, below (retained below my sig) you dont'
have anything even *close* to an answer to this, because there isn't one. It's
fact.

You only have red herrings like "you're not original", and as to the one you're
dragging below, I'm much more concerned about landmines. But it has nothing to
do with the subject either, and no one in this thread, if you've noticed, no one
even posting from misc.kids, as I am, have brought up the "for the kids"
argument save yourself and the OP. It's enough to point out the impact on
everybody of a really nasty destuctive addiction. And I don't claim or need
originality on that statement.

Banty
_____________

Here's a tip, why not get whiney about the quantity of DU dust floating
around the Persian Gulf - oh, that's right, it's not *your* kids/grandkids
that are going to be born deformed, it's not *you* or *your* family that has
to live in an irradiated country is it? Why not get all hot and bothered
about the US's total disregard for the Kyoto Protocol, what about India and
it's almost total lack of control over toxins being dumped into surface
water?

All of these things, my dear, are going to kill more kids than smoking in
the park.

Dan