In message , Richard Schultz wrote:

It is *never* better to top post. *Never ever.

Zealous on the subject as I may be, I'll take issue
with that. If the only content is a one-liner when
the rest of the post is an unedited 700+ lines of
quoted material from six prior generations, then I'd
rather skip scrolling through page after page to find
another mindless AOL!

The rule against top-posting is to encourage editing
and point-by-point contextual discussion. In this
context, that's long gone out the window.

--
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
| The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
+---------- D. C. Sessions ----------+