JanD wrote:
Thanks for proving, you did NOTHING but divert, as usual.

I addressed the person who you mentioned, and what the bilge he wrote
meant in context of reality.

Fred Baughman was. It was the same crap he foisted on the law firms.

'nuf said.

The cut an paste is from Dr. Fred Baughman, who is affiliated with with
the Tom Crude/John Revolta Kriminal Kult of $cientology.

Interestingly, the bilge that was posted formed the basis of five
lawsuits a few years ago. The thrust of these suits was that Novartis
(the patent holder on Ritalin (which is widely available as a
generic)),CHADD, the American Psychological Association, and other
secret organizations, conspired to create the diagnosis of AD/HD just to
sell medications to people diagnosed with it.

Two of the suits were thrown out after the defendants moved for summary
judgment because the plaintiffs failed to state a claim where relief can
be granted, and the other three were withdrawn, as the lawyers saw their
payday disappear.

As for your request, those who claimed it could not prove it when the
defendants demanded an offer of proof.

Thus, their suit was tossed in the dung heap outside of the courtroom
where it belonged.


AND:

YOU can NOT prove the FDA was not a WILLFUL PARTY TO THE ADHD FRAUD.


Mark Probert blathered again:
JanD wrote:
"Mark Probert wrote:
JanD wrote:
"Mark Probert wrote


vernon wrote:
snip

Ilena wrote in message
...


The cut an paste is from Dr. Fred Baughman
snip

Do prove that the FDA was not a WILLFUL PARTY TO THE ADHD FRAUD.
The cut an paste is from Dr. Fred Baughman,
As for your request, those who claimed it could not prove it when the
defendants demanded an offer of proof.
This is another diversion.

YOU are doubting it. YOU prove it.

Lawsuits were NOT mentioned!
Fred Baughman was. It was the same crap he foisted on the law firms.

'nuf said.