"Greegor" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 27, 4:35 pm, "Ron" wrote:
"fx" wrote in message

...





CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY
BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY
AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and
even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are
supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000
children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and
kills
more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of
this
country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No
judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government
agency
because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human
being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights
violations
and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed.
When
are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children
to
their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe
homes
based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers.

Still waiting on an answer fx. Why do you continue to knowingly post
false
information with each of your posts?

Perhaps if you wish to complain about the "false information" you
could post proof that it is false?

I did that already gregg, otherwise I would not have asked the question that
I have. Try reading whats posted.

Did you see the article about Journalists Political contributions Ron?

Nope, dont care either.

Perhaps if more of the 143 Journalists investigated were not biased
left,
their criteria for "false information" would be different?

Could be gregg. But then again more than 80% of journalists are biased
left, are they not? And how about the broadcast news networks gregg? 100%
biased left, are they not?

Ron