"Ronni" ) writes:
"Andre Lieven" wrote in message
...
My Own Doppelganger ) writes:
Well, it's like whatever is best for the kids.

However, I do have a question... Why would a NCP NOT provide some
type of child support? I mean, aren't the kids theirs also?

So ? In the case of children either not of marriages, or the hundreds
of thousands of men being garnished from, who are *not* the bio-
fathers of the children

Not to start an argument but when taken for child support (at least here
in PA) the father (or person being said to be the father) has the option
to request blood or DNA tests before a support order is established.

Thats a good thiing. But, it raises another question: What are the
requirements placed upon the state/claimant as to notification of
the man, *before* a default kourt judgement can be entered against
him ?

So if said Dad has
doubts or just wants to make sure, then he should request blood tests to
prove either way (if proven the father he pays $5 extra a week to pay for
the tests (sent in with the support), if not the father, she pays for the
tests--again here in PA anyway...If 'mom' has nothing to worry about then
she won't get upset about it ;-)

Indeed. It would work best if *all* newborns were tested. Then, there
would be no avenue for doubt to be created, in the first place.

they're being stolen from to pay some lying
woman, there was NO express prior agreement to become a parent
offered the guy.

Further, in all such cases, the *woman is the sole chooser* as to
whether or not there will BE a child.

" Her body, her choice... HER RESPONSIBILITY. "

What part of women being *as responsible for their own choices as
their choices are*, is unclear to you ?

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:20:17 -0600, Anti-Sheila J
smcneillAToddpostDOTcom wrote:

If the court would award me custody of my two daughters (ages 8 and
5), I would be willing to waive child support AND make certain I
exceeded all visitation requirements for their mother. I would make
this deal without any hesitation or reservation, whatsoever.

I was wondering if anyone here feels the same.

The *silence* from women is palpable. Nor do I mean the very few
women here on Usenet, but the *millions* of greedy women going
to kourts, demanding loot for the begging bowls *they unilaterally
chose to whelp*.

If sex is not the determinant time of parental choice for a
woman ( The existance of abortion, RU-486, legal adopting out,
and legal woman-only abandon laws shows that it *isn't* ),
then its SEXIST to claim that it must be, for *men, only*...

Indeed.

Andre
--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.